Volume 15 Issue 1 was published. 
The main theme of the issue: Methodology in Russian Sociology


The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2024. Vol. 15. No 1 published 04/01/2024
2023. Vol. 14. No 4 published 12/25/2023
2023. Vol. 14. No 3 published 09/30/2023
2023. Vol. 14. No 2 published 06/30/2023
All Issue:

2024 ( Vol. 15)  |  1  
2023 ( Vol. 14)  |  4   3   2   1  
2022 ( Vol. 13)  |  4   3   2   1  
2021 ( Vol. 12)  |  4   3   2   1  
2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  4   3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

The influence of gender characteristics on the professional activity of management and subordinate staff

Research Article

Лейла Л Ужахова Candidate of Economics
Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
ORCID ID=0000-0003-1396-6456
Валерия В Саакова
Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
Виктория В Утегенова
Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
Анна А Данилюк
Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
ORCID ID=0000-0003-0616-6055
The influence of gender characteristics on the professional activity of management and subordinate staff.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 170-183

Дата поступления статьи: 27.12.2019
This Article is downloaded: 312 times
Topic: Gender differences and their role in professional and labour relations

For citation:
Ужахова Л. М., Саакова В. В., Утегенова В. Б., Данилюк А. А. The influence of gender characteristics on the professional activity of management and subordinate staff. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 170-183
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2020.11.1.633


The article presents the results of an empirical study on how managers and subordinate staff conform to prescribed gender characteristics. Materials on gender psychology and sociology written by both Russian and foreign authors were used. The meaning of the terms “gender” and “gender characteristics” were more clearly spelled out, while separating the concepts “sex” and “gender” from each other. The authors specified the characteristics of managers and subordinate personnel of either sex in the city of Tyumen, while defining the degree of femininity, masculinity and androgyny in each group using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. The respondents’ answers concerning the role and place of gender stereotypes in the workplace were analyzed; generalized characteristics of managers of either sex were compiled based on the answers they provided, while taking into account the respondent’s sex. When conducting research, the gender characteristics, qualities and skills inherent to each sex (regardless of whether they hold a managing or subordinate position) were ranked. Peculiarities inherent to managers from the city of Tyumen associated with handling a team of employees were determined. It was established that women more often than men possess and broadcast gender stereotypes based on traditional attitudes. Despite this, a tendency towards moving away from traditional gender mindsets and behavior was noticed among both subordinate staff and management, due to them conflicting with work conduct. Researchers recognized that in reality subordinate staff tends to fall in line with prescribed gender characteristics to a greater extent than management. An assumption was made that gender characteristics appear to be more pronounced among managers due to the fact that their personality has a more considerable effect on their actions than is the case with subordinate staff. A conclusion is drawn on the need to further study the phenomenon of androgyny among managers. A recommendation is given for applying the existing practical sociological methods, as well as an adapted socio-psychological set of instruments for each enterprise in particular, since one must consider the balance of androgyny, femininity and masculinity in any given team of employees when choosing the means and methods of administrative action when it comes to developing, approving and implementing management solutions, as well as appropriate conduct in conflict situations.


gender characteristics, gender, superiors, subordinates, femininity, masculinity, androgyny


Alexandrova O. A., Burdastova Y. V., Nenakhova Y. S., Khotkina Z. A. Gender aspects of employment and career in the media industry of Georgia, Moldova and Russia: comparative analysis. AIRP Official website, 2018. Available at: https://anri.org.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gendernye-aspekty-zanyatosti.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2019] (In Russ.).

Avdulova T. P. Gender aspects of management. Saint-Petersburg, Rech', 2012: 130 (In Russ.).

Chaplyukova O. B., Osipova M. Y. Gender as a determinant of organizational leadership behaviour. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = Actual Problems of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2014: 5 (1): 267–271 (In Russ.).

Chirikova A. E. Woman in charge of the firm. Moscow, IS RAS publ. 1998: 358 (In Russ.).

Evdokimova E. N. A successful supervisor – who is he? Gender differences in leadership positions. Economika i sotsium = Economy and Socium, 2016: 6: 44–49 (In Russ.).

Gontar Y. S. Androginia as a modern direction of development of gender research of students of the Faculty of Social and Cultural Activities of the MGUKI. Vestnik MGUKI = Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 2012: 45: 193–198 (In Russ.).

Il'inykh S. A., Bychkova M. M. Gender analysis of management decision-making. Obschestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2019: 5 (In Russ.).

Il'yaeva I. A., Savenkova I. V. Historical and sociological view of the impact of gender relations in management. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Bulletin. Serie: Humanities, 2007: 50: 159–165 (In Russ.).

Isakova E. V. Gender stereotypes and their impact on work: avtoref. dis. kand. philos. n. Kemerovo, 2006: 20 (In Russ.).

Khokhlova T. P. Identification of gender aspects of management - factor of management efficiency improvement. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom = Management in Russia and Other Countries, 200: 2: 67–74 (In Russ.).

Koroliova O. V. Gender differences in leadership styles accounting as a factor in improving enterprise performance. Voprosy sovremennoy nauki i praktiki = Problems of Modern Science and Practice, 2007: 2: 113–118 (In Russ.).

Kurysheva O. V., Voznesenskaya A. V. Gender differences in strategy and tactics of self-declaration. Vestnik VolGU. Seriya 11: Estestvennye nauki = Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 11: Natural Sciences, 2015: 2: 122–131 (In Russ.).

Kviatkovskaya M. D. Gender dimensions of decision-making by managers in time-constraints. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya = Organizational Psychology, 2015: 5: 139–154 (In Russ.).

Matiushina N. O. Gender characteristics of the professional image of the manager. Vestnik magistratury = Bulletin of the Magistracy, 2018: 86: 55–58 (In Russ.).

Skiba E. K. Gender regimes as a reflection of power relations. Antropologicheskie izmereniya philosofskikh issledovanii = Antropological Measures of Philosophical Studies, 2015: 7: 103–110 (In Russ.).

Sokolskaya V. V. Gender stereotypes in the labour market: on the example of a mono-profile city: avtoref. dis. kand. sociol. sci. Ekaterinburg, 2003: 32 (In Russ.).

Vinacke E. Stereotypes as Social Concepts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1957: 46: 222–249.

Content 2020' 32