This paper examines media representation of environmental problems in six Russian regions through the lens of regional public pages (with official and unofficial status) on the VKontakte social network, which function as online media. Based on a content analysis of news public pages on VKontakte from six Russian regions, including both environmentally favorable and unfavorable ones, the study examines how environmental issues are covered in these constituent entities of the Russian Federation and how this correlates with their environmental status. Several differences in the coverage of environmental issues were identified: in regions with a low environmental rating, environmental problems receive more media attention, which is confirmed by a larger number of publications on environmental topics in such regions as Krasnoyarsk Krai and Zabaykalsky Krai. At the same time, official public pages more often focus on official events and achievements in the field of ecology, while unofficial public pages more often cover specific incidents and environmental problems. Low audience engagement with the environmental agenda was noted. Environmental news typically receives fewer likes, comments, and reposts compared to other topics, indicating a lower level of audience attention to environmental issues and lower emotional engagement. Thematic modeling analysis confirmed that in regions with serious environmental problems, such as Krasnoyarsk Krai, topics like air pollution, waste disposal, and forest fires are frequently discussed. The identified regional differences show that in regions with a high environmental rating, environmental issues are covered less frequently, which may be associated with a more favorable environmental situation and less attention to these issues from online media. This study demonstrates the important role of media in general, and social media public pages in particular, in shaping public opinion on environmental issues and highlights the need to increase environmental awareness and public engagement.

Environmental problems of Russian regions, online media, VKontakte public pages, official media, unofficial media, audience engagement, thematic modeling, public opinion, environmental awareness

1. Aşıksoy G., Isa N. A., Gökçekuş H. The role of mass media and level of education in spreading environmental sustainability awareness in developing countries. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2020: 177: 237–241. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.24833.
2. Brown P., Cameron L. et al. Latino and Non-Latino Perceptions of the Air Quality in California’s San Joaquin Valley. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016: 13: 12: 1242. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13121242.
3. Carducci A., Donzelli G. et al. Air pollution: A study of citizen’s attitudes and behaviors using different information sources. Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health, 2017: 14: 2: e12389-1–e12389-9. DOI: 10.2427/12389.
4. Chan E., Hon A. H. Y. et al. What drives employees’ intentions to implement green practices in hotels? The role of knowledge, awareness, concern and ecological behaviour. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2014: 40: 20–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.001.
5. Ermolaeva P., Ermolaeva Yu. et al. Environmental issues in Russian cities: towards the understanding of regional and national mass media discourse. Russian Journal of Communication, 2020: 12: 1: 48–65. DOI: 10.1080/19409419.2020.1729464.
6. Groffman P. M., Stylinski C. et al. Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2010: 8: 6: 284–291. DOI: 10.1890/090160.
7. Huang H. Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 2016: 69: 2206–2212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.031.
8. Jia M., Tong L. et. al. Word power: The impact of negative media coverage on disciplining corporate pollution. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016: 138: 3: 437–458. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2596-2.
9. Mayer B. “Relax and take a deep breath”: Print media coverage of asthma and air pollution in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 2012: 75: 5: 892–900. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.024.
10. Mayer H. Air pollution in cities. Atmospheric Environment, 1999: 33: 24–25: 4029–4037. DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00144-2.
11. Mingaleva Z., Vukovic N. et. al. Waste Management in Green and Smart Cities: A Case Study of Russia. Sustainability, 2019: 12: 1: 1–17. DOI: 10.3390/su12010094.
12. Schoenfeld A. C., Meier R. F., Griyn R. J. Constructing a Social Problem: the Press and the Environment. Social Problems, 1979: 27: 1: 38–61. DOI: 10.2307/800015.
13. Semenova G. Global environmental problems in Russia. E3S Web of Conferences, 2020: 157: 02023. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202015702023.
14. Sharkova E. A., Nigmatullina K. et. al. Ecological journalism in regional political processes. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 2017: 23: 2: 1079–1084. EDN: UXNUHR.
15. Spektor M., Kitsuse J. I. Constructing Social Problems. Transl. from Eng. Moscow, Routledge, 2017: 184.
16. Tenenboim O. Comments, Shares, or Likes: What Makes News Posts Engaging in Different Ways. Social Media + Society, 2022: 8: 4: 205630512211302. DOI: 10.1177/20563051221130282.
17. Varela-Candamio L., Novo-Corti I., García-Álvarez M. T. The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018: 170: 1565–1578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214.
18. Zhang Y., Zhang R., Zhang C. Insight into the driving force of environmental performance improvement: Environmental regulation or media coverage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022: 358: 132024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132024.