Power in small Russian cities: managerial problems and motivation of actors

The paper analyses Russian municipal power on the example of small Russian cities. The analysis is based on the results of an empirical study conducted with the author's participation in six small towns in Perm Krai, Ivanovo and Tambov regions. The research was conducted in two stages. The first stage consisted of 69 in-depth interviews with representatives of local and regional elites and experts conducted in 2012-2015. At the second stage in 2018 -2020, 64 interviews were conducted, including as well the same respondents who were interviewed at the first stage. In 2023, several additional interviews were conducted with experts in the city G of Perm Krai due to the dramatically changed situation.

The conducted research allows us to say that the problem field of small towns has not changed so significantly over the years. The problems are still concentrated around the theme of deteriorating socio-economic situation, taxes and personnel deficit. At the same time, managerial problems of the authorities are growing due to the deficit of personnel in small towns, managerial weakness of some heads of small towns. Among the new problems are pandemic, insufficient number of leaders in the corps of municipal managers, and the consequences of SWO. The analysis of the motivational profile of the heads of municipal entities and their teams has shown that in recent years the level of motivation and management efficiency have increased among the heads of cities. The elites' and population's demand for power has significantly increased, which could not but affect the internal motivation of actors. The empirical study on the example of one single-industry town demonstrated that a small town despite all resource and other constraints can continue to develop if a partnership model of interaction between local authorities and strategic leaders of a large company is formed. However, it does not always guarantee that the achieved efficiency of interaction between government and business will remain unchanged if the federal government interferes in the system of relations between the two actors.

power, Russia, small towns, motivation of actors, leadership

1. Vitkovskaya T. B., Ryabova O. A. Monogoroda Srednego Urala: Lokal’niye eliti i politicheskiye protsessi [Monotowns of the Middle Urals: local elites and political processes]. Yekaterinburg, RIO URO RAN, 2011: 259 (in Russ.). EDN: QONDUD.
2. Vlast', biznes, obshchestvo v regionakh: nepravil'nyi treugol'nik [Power, business, society in regions: irregular triangle]. Ed. by N. Petrov, A. Titkov. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2010: 437 (in Russ.). EDN: QOLMZV.
3. Gel’man V. Ya., Ryzhenkov S. I. Lokal'nye rezhimy, gorodskoe upravlenie i "vertikal' vlasti" v sovremennoi Rossii [Local regimes, city government and “power vertical” in modern Russia]. Politicheskaia ekspertiza: Politeks, 2010: 4: 130–151 (in Russ.). EDN: NTWCIP.
4. Gel'man V., Ryzhenkov S., Belokurova E., Borisova N. Avtonomiia ili kontrol? Reforma mestnoi vlasti v gorodakh Rossii [Autonomy or control? Reform of local government in modern Russia. 1991-2001]. St. Petersburg, Letnii sad, 2002: 380 (in Russ.).
5. Gel'man V., Ryzhenkov S., Belokurova E., Borisova N. Reforma mestnoi vlasti v gorodakh Rossii. 1991-2006 [Reform of local government in modern Russia. 1991-2006]. St. Petersburg, Norma, 2008: 368 (in Russ.).
6. Dakhin A. V., Solonchenko E. I. Urban politics: critical analysis of theoretical approaches. Vlast', 2019: 6: 216–224 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i6.6855; EDN: CPUPEW.
7. Lapina N. Yu., Chirikova A. E. Regional'nye elity v RF: modeli povedeniia i politicheskie orientatsii [Regional elites in Russia: models of behavior and political orientations]. Moscow, INION, 1999: 192 (In Russ.).
8. Ledyaev V. G. Sotsiologiia vlasti [Sociology of power]. Moscow, NIU VShE, 2012: 472 (in Russ.). EDN: SDSRBH.
9. Ledyaev V. G. Vlast': kontseptual'nyi analiz [Power: A conceptual analysis]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2001: 384 (in Russ.).
10. Small towns in social space. Ed. by V. V. Markin, M. F. Chernysh. Moscow, FNISTs RAN, 2019: 545 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-323-2.2019.
11. Russian small towns: new chellenges, social problems and perspectives. Ed. By M. F. Chernysh, V. V. Markin. Moscow, FNISС RAN, 2021: 598 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-378-2.2021.
12. Moliarenko O. Local government in Russia or chronicles of distant power. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya, , 2021: 1: 8–28 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-1-8-28; EDN: XBTIYE.
13. Oleinik A. N. Vlast' i rynok [Power and market]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2011: 437 (in Russ.).
14. Pustovoit Yu. Urban political regimes: typology, reasons for formation, possibilities of actors. Vestnik Buriatskogo gosun-ta. Ekonomika i menedzhment, 2017: 3: 9–16 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18101/2304-4446-2017-3-9-16; EDN: ZRBPRT.
15. Turovskiy R. Local government in Russia and the evolution of political regime in Russia. Pro nunc, 2015: 1: 82–98 (in Russ.). EDN: VHWOAF.
16. Turovskiy R Settlement as a subject of local politics: theoretical bases of research. Politicheskaia nauka, 2019: 2: 13–30 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31249/poln/2019.02.01; EDN: WXXSAC.
17. Turovskiy R., Vaselenko E. Current condition and perspectives of the development of intra-city local government. Regionologiia, 2019: 27: 1: 13–30 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.106.027.201901.100-121; EDN: YZUBNR.
18. Tykanova E. V., Khokhlova A. M. Urban political regime in Saint Petersburg: the role of real and imaginary “growth machines” in the struggle for urban space. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki, 2015: 2: 241–256 (in Russ.). EDN: UMAZMP.
19. Chirikova A. E. Regional elites of Russia. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2010 (in Russ.). EDN: RAZOXF.
20. Chirikova A. E., Ledyaev V. G. Power in a small Russian town. Moscow, NIU VShE, 2017: 414 (in Russ.). EDN: XTHYDB.
21. Chirikova A. E., Lediaev V. G. Heads of small Russian towns: leadership and effectiveness of government. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya, 2021: 1: 29–48 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-1-29-48 EDN: ARGXCN.
22. Cochrane A. Illusions of power: interviewing local elites. Environment and Planning A, 1998: 30: 12: 2121–2132.
23. Dahl R. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in American City. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1961: 355.
24. Gel’man V., Ryzhenkov S. Local Regimes, Sub-national Governance and the “Power Vertical” in Contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 2011: 63: 3: 449–465. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557538.
25. Glinka K. The Urban Regime Theory in Political Science Research – The Possibilities and Limitations of Implementation. Polish Political Science Review, 2020: 8: 2: 1–21. DOI: 10.2478/ppsr-2020-0012.
26. Harding A. The History of Community Power. In Theories of Urban Politics. Ed. by J. S. Davies, D. L. Imbroscio. London, Sage, 2009: 27–39.
27. Hunter F. Community Power Structure. A Study of Decision-makers. Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 1953: 297.
28. Stone C. N. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas, 1989: 314.
29. Stone C. Trends in the Study of Urban Politics: A Paradigmatic View. Urban Affairs Review, 2017: 53: 1: 3–39. DOI: 10.1177/1078087416674328.
30. Wanna J. Regional Political Leadership. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Ed. by R. A. W. Rhodes, P. Hart. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014: 564–579.