Volume 11 Issue 2 was published.
The main theme of the issue: Social Determinants of Russian Society: Yesterday and Today
  
The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2020. Vol. 11. No 2 published 06/29/2020
2020. Vol. 11. No 1 published 03/29/2020
2019. Vol. 10. No 4 published 12/12/2019
2019. Vol. 10. No 3 published 09/30/2019
All Issue:

2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

Sociology of volunteering: defining the boundaries of research


Andrei V. Nevskii , Sociological Institute of the FCTAS RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia,
mailto: anevskij@gmail.com
ORCID ID=0000-0002-1206-8569
Sociology of volunteering: defining the boundaries of research.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 32-48

DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.1.624

Дата поступления статьи: 02.02.2020
This Article is downloaded: 54 times
Topic: Volunteers: boundaries of research

For citation:
Andrei V. Nevskii. Sociology of volunteering: defining the boundaries of research. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 32-48
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2020.11.1.624




Abstract

The sociological study of volunteerism typically uses a definition which includes all possible types of free, unpaid activities which benefit other people. Such an approach transforms the very phenomenon of volunteerism into an analytical tool for studying various fields of economic and social life: degrees of development of civil society, employment structure, features of a certain economic mode. Regardless, the use of such a definition when researching volunteer movements presents certain problems. Multiple critics point out that such an approach towards understanding volunteerism, on one hand, leads to various types of volunteer activity being excluded from the scope of research, namely those which do not fully comply with the aforementioned criteria of free choice and gratuitousness; on the other hand, it waters down the concept of volunteerism, by merging it with other forms of civil action, such as political activism. Furthermore, most studies exhibit a tendency towards highlighting volunteerism as a special type of action, which possesses persistent intrinsic characteristics regardless of the field in which it is being undertaken. Such an approach results in a complete lack of care for certain essential features of various types of those productive activities which volunteers can partake in. It’s also worth noting that research doesn’t tend to include practices of volunteerism when the main focus of analysis shifts towards studying the socio-demographic characteristics of participants, as well as issues concerning their motivation. Based on analyzing Russian and foreign sources, the article presents an overview of the issues associated with defining the boundaries of the field in question, while discussing the main difficulties when it comes to constructing a general theory of volunteerism, and analyzing the separation of various forms of civil activity which is typically present in foreign literature: volunteerism, grassroots political involvement, civil activism. The article brings forth arguments for limiting the subject of research and for analytical separation between various forms of civil activity.

Keywords

volunteering, civic activism, labor, leisure, NGO

References

Anheier H. K., Salamon L. Volunteering in Cross-National Perspective: Initial Comparisons. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1999: 62 (4): 43–65.

Brante T. Sociological Approaches to the Professions. Acta Sociologica, 1988: 31 (2): 119–142.

Brudney J. L. Volunteers. International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Ed. by H. Anheier, S. Toepler. London, Routlege, 2010: 1620–1627.

Cnaan R.A., Handy F., Wadsworth M. Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1996; 25 (3): 364–83. DOI: 10.1177/0899764096253006

Eliasoph N. Making Volunteers civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2011: 308.

Eliasoph N. The Politics of Volunteering. London, Polity Press, 2013: 214.

Evers A., von Essen J. Volunteering and Civic Action: Boundaries Blurring, Boundaries Redrawn. Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2019: 30 (1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-00086-0

Haddad M. A. From Undemocratic to Democratic Civil Society: Japan’s Volunteer Fire Departments. The Journal of Asian Studies, 2010: 69 (1): 33–56.

Hustinx L., Cnaan R.A., Handy F. Navigating Theories of Volunteering: A Hybrid Map for a Complex Phenomenon. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2010: 40 (4): 410–434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00439.x

Hustinx L., Handy F., Cnaan R. A., Brudney J. L., Pessi A. B., Yamauchi N. Social and Cultural Origins of Motivations to Volunteer: A Comparison of University Students in Six Countries. International Sociology, 2010: 25 (3): 349–382. DOI: 10.1177/0268580909360297

Hustinx L., Lammertyn F. Collective and Reflexive Styles of Volunteering. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2003: 14 (2): 167–87. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023948027200

ILO (International Labor Organization). Manual on the Measurement of Volunteer Work. Geneve, ILO publ., 2011: 120.

Istomina A., Oberemko O. Are volunteer and protest activities compatible? (based on self-descriptions of Russian volunteers). Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya = Public Opinion Monitor, 2015: 2 (126): 72–82 (In Russ.).

Janoski T., Musick M., Wilson J. Being Volunteered? The Impact of Social Participation and Pro-Social Attitudes on Volunteering. Sociological Forum, 1998: 13 (3): 495–519.

Klepikova A. Volunteers of a charitable organization in a public institution for people with severe disabilities: constructs of volunteering and professionalism. Zhurnal Issledovaniy Social'noy Politiki = Journal of Social Policy Research, 2011: 9 (3): 391–416 (In Russ.).

Klepikova A. Sanitary worker of a state neuropsychiatric institution: the "old" profession in the context of a new ideology of attitude towards people with disabilities. In: Professii v social'nom gosudarstve = Professions in a Social State. Ed. by P. V. Romanov, E. R. Yarskaya-Smirnova. Moscow, Variant, CSPGI, 2013: 137–58 (In Russ.).

Kudrinskaya L. Volunteer labor: essence, functions, specificity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2006: 5: 15–22 (In Russ.).

Lichterman P., Eliasoph N. Civic Action. American Journal of Sociology, 2014: 120 (3): 798–863. DOI: 10.1086/679189

Lois J. Socialization to Heroism: Individualism and Collectivism in a Voluntary Search and Rescue Group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1999: 62 (2): 117–135. DOI: 10.2307/2695853

Musick M., Wilson J. Volunteers: A Social Profile. Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 2008: 680.

Nevskii A. Volunteer rescuers in the emergency response system in Russia: on the issue of interaction between civil organizations and government organizations. Vlast' I Elity = Power and Elite, 2018: 5: 562–589 (In Russ.).

Olson M. Logics of collective actions. Public goods and the group theory. Moscow, FEI, 1995: 165 (In Russ.).

Overgaard C. Rethinking Volunteering as a Form of Unpaid Work. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2019: 48 (1): 128–145.

Pearce J. Volunteers. The Organizational Behavior of Unpaid Workers. London, Routlege, 1993: 223

Pevnaya M. Volunteering as a Sociological Problem. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2013: 2: 110–119.

Pudal R. Not-Quite-Workers and Paradoxical Unionization: What Can Be Learned from Volunteer Firefighters. Sociétés Contemporaines, 2012: 87 (3): 75–97. DOI: 10.3917/soco.087.0075

Pudal R. Politics in the Fire Station. Revue Française de Science Politique, 2011: 61 (5): 917–944. DOI: 10.3917/rfsp.615.0917

Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 1995: 6 (1): 65–78.

Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, Simon & Schuster, 2000: 747.

Rochester C., Paine A. E., Howlett S. Volunteering and Society in the 21st Century. London, Palgrave, 2012: 289.

Roose J. Social Movements and Neo-Institutionalism: A Fruitful Merger? In: Social Theory and Social Movements. Mutual Inspirations. Ed. by J. Roose, H. Dietz. Heidelberg, Springer, 2016: 113–135.

Salamon L., Benevolenski V., Jacobson L. Penetrating the Dual Realities of Government-Nonprofit Relations in Russia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2015: 26 (6): 2178–2214. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9652-5

Salamon L., Sokolowski W. Volunteering in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence From 24 Countries. Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, 40. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 2001.

Smith D. H. Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1994: 23 (3): 243–263.

Smith D. H. Voluntary action and voluntary groups. Annual review of sociology 1975th. Palo Alto, CA, Annual Reviews, 1975.

Voluntary Action Research. Ed. by D.H. Smith. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1973: 407.

Snyder M., Omoto A.M., Crain A.L. Punished for their Good Deeds. Stigmatization of AIDS Volunteers. American Behavioral Scientist, 1999: 42 (7): 1175–1192. DOI: 10.1177/0002764299042007009

Stebbins R. Volunteering: A Serious Leisure Perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1996: 25 (2): 211–224. DOI: 10.1177/0899764096252005

Volunteering as Leisure / Leisure as Volunteering. An International Assessment. Ed. by R. Stebbins, M. Graham. Wallingford (UK), CABI publ., 2004: 270.

Tilly C., Tilly Ch. Capitalist Work and Labor Markets. In: The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Ed. by N. J. Smelser, R. Swedberg. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 283–312.

Wilson J. Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 2000: 26: 215–40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215

Wilson J. Volunteerism Research: Review Essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2012: 41 (2): 176–212. DOI: 10.1177/0899764011434558

Wilson J., Musick M. Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work. American Sociological Review, 1997: 62 (5): 694–713. DOI: 10.2307/2657355

Wuthnow R. Acts of Compassion. Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1991: 342.


Content 2020' 32