Volume 12 Issue 3 was published. 
The main theme of the issue: Individual and society in the global postmodernity: socio-cultural metamorphoses
The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2021. Vol. 12. No 3 published 09/30/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 2 published 06/30/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 1 published 04/01/2021
2020. Vol. 11. No 4 published 12/28/2020
All Issue:

2021 ( Vol. 12)  |  3   2   1  
2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  4   3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

Institutional analysis as a promising direction for the evaluation of social movements (an analytical overview)

Natalia Skobelina, Doctor of Sociology, Associate professor, associate of other organizaiton, , Doctor of sociological sciences, professor, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russia
mailto: volnatmax@mail.ru
Institutional analysis as a promising direction for the evaluation of social movements (an analytical overview).
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 162-175

DOI: 10.19181/vis.2017.20.1.448

This Article is downloaded: 298 times
Topic: To the methodology of scientific research

For citation:
Natalia Skobelina. Institutional analysis as a promising direction for the evaluation of social movements (an analytical overview). Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 162-175
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2017.20.1.448


This article highlights certain aspects of the institutional analysis of social movements. The author defines institutional analysis as a promising way of evaluating social movements. Utilizing instruments of the new institutional economic theory, social movements are examined as institutionalized practices in a certain institutional environment. The author defines the role of formal and informal rules for forming and developing movements. An algorithm for evaluating social movements is devised within the framework of the neo-institutional theory, the former being comprised of the following important aspects: examining movements as rules of play, defining the institutional design of movements, studying institutional capabilities of movements, describing the dynamic of movements. With attention mainly being focused on the institutional dependence of social movements, defined during the course of the institutional analysis is the organizational activeness of movements in time and space. The author emphasizes the fact that the key role in the dynamics of movements is placed upon institutional environment. Formal and informal norms structure movements and form the mechanism of interaction between government bodies and civil society institutions. The article highlights the political, social-economic and organizational capabilities which are provided to social movements by the institutional environment. Increased capabilities can help those who partake in movements solve several of those problems which ordinary citizens of Russia encounter. The author concludes that in modern Russian society a considerable role is played by those institutional conditions which the government provides to its citizens in order to articulate their interests.


social movements, new institutional economics, institutional analysis, dynamics.


Berger P., Lukman T. Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotziologii znanija [Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow, Medium, 1995. 323 p.

Brendeleva E. A. Neoinstitucional'naja teorija [Neoinstitutional Theory]. Ed. by M. N. Chepurina. Moscow, TEIS, 2003. 253 p.

Coase R. The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1984, vol. 140, pp. 229–231.

Dimitrov R. Organizacija, dvizhenie, institute [Organization, Movement, Institute]. Obschestvennye samodejatel'nye dvizhenija: problemy i perspektivy. Moscow, Logos, 2010. 210 p.

Dowbor M. Institutional dimensions of social movements: case study of the Sanitario movement and its fight for universal access to health in Brazil. Democracy, Governance and Development: Between the Institutional and the Political the First Oxford DGD Conference in June 2011. The web portal “QEH Working Paper Repository”. Release 2011. URL: http://www3.qeh.ox.ac.uk/pdf/qehwp/qehwps187.pdf [date of visit: 24.10.2016].

Evans E. Constitutional inclusion of animal rights in Germany and Switzerland: how did animal protection become an Issue of national importance? Society and Animals, 2010, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 231–250.

Frolov D. P. Obzor XI Puschinskogo simpoziuma po evoliucionnoy economike [Review of the 11th Pushchino Symposium on Evolutionary Economics]. Zhurnal institucional'nykh issledovaniy, 2015, vol. 7, no 4, pp. 157–162.

Giddens A. Ustroenie obschestva: Ocherk teorii strukturacii [The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration]. Moscow, Akademichesky proekt, 2005. 528 p.

King B. The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Social Problems, 2011, vol. 58, no 4, pp. 491–517.

Kriesi H. The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization. Jenkins J., Klandermans B. The Politics of Social Protest. Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements. London, UCL Press, 1995, pp. 83–99.

Nort D. Instituty, institucional'nye izmenenija i funkcionirovanie economiki. Moscow, Fond economicheskoy knigi Nachala, 1997. 180 p.

Ostrom E. Upravliaja obschim: evoliucija institutov kollektivnoy dejatel'nosti [Managing the General: the Evolution of the Institutions of Collective Activity]. Moscow, IRISEN, Mysl', 2010. 447 p.

Ponomariova I. V. Metodologija institucional'nogo analiza v social'nykh issledovanijakh [Methodology of Institutional Analysis in Social Studies]. Sociologija social'noy real'nosti: metodologija, teorija, metodika issledovaniy javleniy i processov. Vol. 1. Ed. by V. N. Petrov, E. M. Kulikov, V. N. Rakachev. Krasnodar, Prosveschenie-Jug, 2010, pp. 116–130.

Raskov D. Ritorika novoy institucional'noy economicheskoy teorii [Rhetoric of a New Institutional Economic Theory]. Voprosy economiki, 2010, no 5, pp. 81–95.

Schneiberg M., Lounsbury M. Social Movements and Institutional Analysis. The handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2008, vol. 648, pp. 648–670.

Shtompka P. Sotziologija. Analiz sovremennogo obschestva [Sociology. Analysis of Modern Society]. Moscow, Logos, 2005. 664 p.

Soule S., Olzak S., Coddou M., Munoz J. Friends or Foes? How Social Movement Allies Affect The Passage of Legislation in the U.S.Congress. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2016, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 213–230.

Spector M., Kitsuse J. Social Problems: a reformulation. Social Problems, 1973, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 145–159.

Swanson D. Toward an integrative theory for business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 1999, vol. 24, pp. 506–521.

Content 2017' 20