This article provides a theoretical justification for the concept of post-agrarianism as a promising analytical framework for analyzing the current state and development potential of rural territories in Central Russia. The authors argue that the Russian countryside is undergoing a profound, multifaceted transformation involving the replacement of traditional labor-intensive agriculture with high-tech agricultural holdings, the contraction of agricultural employment, depopulation and aging of the rural population, and the emergence of new non-agricultural forms of using non-urban spaces.

The paper systematizes key theoretical approaches to studying post-agrarian changes developed in Russian and international scholarship, including concepts of the “new peasantry,” rurality, de-urbanization, and hybrid rural-urban communities. Special attention is paid to the analytical potential of the “Pokrovsky Matrix,” developed within the framework of the long-term Ugra Project. The Matrix identifies six factors (environmental preference, landscape richness, historical-cultural rootedness, presence of local population, transport accessibility, and stable infocommunications), the combination of which allows for assessing the degree of post-agrarian processes in specific localities.

The empirical basis of the article consists of materials from field expeditions conducted in 2024–2025 in the Gorodetsky District of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, Belevsky District of the Tula Region, Babaevsky District of the Vologda Region, and Kozelsky District of the Kaluga Region. The research documented diverse post-agrarian practices: the creation of eco-trails and development of tourist infrastructure by national parks and private initiatives, diversification of farms toward agritourism and gastronomic branding, formation of private guesthouses and amusement parks, and cooperation between local entrepreneurs and travel agencies. The authors conclude that post-agrarianism serves as a constructive theoretical-methodological framework allowing for the integration of social, economic, cultural, and environmental aspects of rural development into a single analytical project. In contrast to narrowly sectoral approaches focused exclusively on the efficiency of agricultural production, the post-agrarian lens makes visible phenomena such as the ecological rehabilitation of landscapes, the development of recreational and tourist infrastructure, the formation of hybrid communities of local residents and de-urbanizing urbanites, as well as commemorative practices linked to historical and cultural heritage. The application of this lens opens up possibilities for identifying hidden drivers of development, assessing the effects of implemented state and private initiatives, and substantiating interdisciplinary research on the Russian countryside during its transition to a new “aggregate state.”

post-agrarianism, rurality, urbanization, centrifugal migration, rural crisis, Russian village, problems of the Russian village, development potential of the Russian village, rural entrepreneurship, agrotourism

1. Averkieva K. V. Agricultural employment change in Blacksoil and Non-blacksoil zones of Russia since 2000-th years. Regionalnye issledovaniya, 2017: 58: 4: 26–37 (in Russ.). EDN: YQUEJF.
2. Alekseev A. I., Zubarevich N. V. Krizis urbanizacii i selskaja mestnost' Rossii. In Migracija i urbanizacija v SNG i Baltii v 1990-e gg. [The crisis of urbanization and rural areas in Russia. In Migration and urbanization in the CIS and Baltic states in the 1990s]. Ed. by. Zh. A. Zajonchkovskoj. Moscow, 1999: 83–94 (in Russ).
3. Atutova J. V. Post-agrarian transformation of geosystems of the Tunkinskaya depression (republic of Buryatia). Regionalnye geosistemy, 2019: 43(3): 232–242 (in Russ). DOI: 10.18413/2075-4671-2019-43-3-232-242
4. Budazhanaeva M. Ts. Demographic Trends in Rural Areas of the Russian Federation. Living Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2024: 20: 4: 612–628 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_10_612_628; EDN: OGLBBV.
5. Vyalshina A. A. Prevalence of smoking and alcohol consumption among rural population in Russia. Sotsialnye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya, 2021: 67: 5: 8 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2021-67-5-8; EDN: FQFQEC.
6. Citizens in the Village. Sociological Studies in the Russian Hinterland: De-urbanization and Rural-Urban Communities. Ed. by V. I. Ilyin, N. E. Pokrovsky. Moscow, Univer. kniga, 2016: 404 (in Russ.).
7. Denisenko M. B., Nikolaeva U. G. What happens to the rural population in the Russian Near North? (the case of Kostroma region). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015: 12: 70–81 (in Russ.). EDN: VGMFSH.
8. Makshanchikova A. Yu., Nikishin E. A., Popov D. S. Extra-urban Localities: Hybridization of ‘Rural’ and ‘Urban’ in the Process of Migration of Citizens to the Countryside. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2019: 45: 12: 61–70 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007751-9; EDN: UZQOKP.
9. Makhrova A. G., Nefedova T. G., Treivish A. I. Moscow Oblast: Territorial Structure of Post-Soviet Transformations. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya, 2023: 87: 8: 1207–1223 (in Russ). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556623080113; EDN: WYVFXM.
10. Between home… and home. Return spatial mobility of the population of Russia. Ed. by T. G. Nefedova, K. V. Averkieva, A. G. Makhrova. Moscow, Novyy khronograf, 2016: 504 (in Russ.).
11. Mukhanova M. N. Transformation of the Russian village in the conditions of digitalization of the аgro-industrial complex. Nauchnyi rezultat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie, 2021: 7: 4: 167–179 (in Russ). DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2021-7-4-1-1; EDN: ZUZMSP.
12. Nefedova T. G. Transformation of agriculture and employment problems in rural areas. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye problemy Rossii, 2025: 62: 2: 137–155 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31249/espr/2025.02.07; EDN: UAFVIW.
13. Nefedova T. G., Baskin L. M., Pokrovsky N. E. Evolution of Socio-Economic Space in the Local Rural Areas in the Remote Northern Russian (Case of the Manturovsky District of the Kostroma Region). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2021: 12: 124–134 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016852-0; EDN: HFSDMR.
14. Nefedova T. G., Medvedev A. A. Shrinkage of developed space in the central part of European Russia: population dynamics and land use in rural areas. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya, 2020: 84: 5: 645–659 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S258755662005012X; EDN: BFSDZN.
15. Nefedova T. G., Nikolaeva U. G. Modern personal subsidiary plots of villagers and townspeople: historical dynamics, functions, spatial differences. Naselenie i ekonomika, 2019: 3: 1: 95–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.3897/popecon.3.e34903.
16. Nefedova T. G., Nikolaeva U. G., Pokrovsky N. E. Intelligentsia in the space of non-urban Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2016: 12: 52–61 (in Russ.). EDN: XGVSGZ.
17. Nefedova T. G., Treivish A. I. Polarization and shrinkage of active space in the core of Russia: trends, problems and possible solutions. Demograficheskoe obozrenie, 2020: 7: 2: 31–53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11138; EDN: KXQEAW.
18. Nefedova T. G., Treyvish A. I. The transformation of settlement in modern Russia: urbanization or de-urbanization? Regionalnye issledovaniya, 2017: 56: 2: 12–23 (in Russ.). EDN: ZDREZZ.
19. Nikulin A. М., Pokrovsky N. E., There is and there will be territorial reformatting of rural spaces. Krest'yanovedenie, 2023: 8: 2: 140–158 (in Russ). DOI: 10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-2-140-158; EDN: EFEFFF.
20. Oikoumene of the Near North of Russia. Ed. by N. E. Pokrovsky, T. G. Nefedova. Moscow, Univer. kniga, 2016: 264 (in Russ.).
21. Pokrovsky N. E. Perspektivy rossiyskogo Severa: sel'skie soobshchestva [Prospects of the Russian North: rural communities]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 2008: 17: 4: 111–134 (in Russ.). EDN: KBCNDP.
22. Pokrovsky N. E., Nikishin E. A., Makshanchikova A. Yu. What’s After the City? Perspectives on the Rural-Urban Path of Life. Chelovek, 2022: 33: 5: 44–62 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070022791-7; EDN: FXANJQ.
23. Pokrovsky N. E., Nikolaeva U. G., Demidova Ju. A. Phenomenology of the “Lifeworld” of Urbanites in the Extraurban Space in the Near North: the House and Domestication. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2019: 12: 71–80 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007752-0; EDN: MNOUDI.
24. Potentsial Blizhnego Severa: ekonomika, ekologiya, sel'skie poseleniya. K 15-letiyu Ugorskogo proekta [The Potential of the Near North: economy, ecology, rural settlements. On the 15th anniversary of the Ugorsky Project]. Ed. by N. E. Pokrovsky, T. G. Nefedova. Moscow, Logos, 2014: 200 (in Russ.).
25. Rumjancev I. N., Smirnova A. A., Tkachenko A. A. Rural settlements “without population” as a geographical and statistical phenomenon. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya, 2019: 1: 29–37 (in Russ.). EDN: YZNKWT.
26. Old-developed regions in the space of Russia: history and modernity. Ed. by T. G. Nefedova, A. V. Starikova. Moscow, KMK, 2021: 379 (in Russ.).
27. Uzun V. Ya., Shagayda N. I. et. al. Holdingization of Russian agribusiness. Moscow, DELO, 2022: 344 (in Russ.).
28. Shilova V. A., Bykov K. V. et. al. Practices of organizing rural tourism in the context of the post-agrarian vector of development of extra-urban areas on the example of the Nizhny Novgorod region. Nauchnyi rezultat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie, 2025: 11: 1: 262–277 (in Russ). DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-1-1-7; EDN: XVNUXС.
29. Shchepanskaia T. B. On the dynamics of post-agrarian development: the recycling of a rural fur farm in the Republic of Karelia. Slovesnosti i istoriya, 2021: 2: 108–124 (in Russ). DOI: 10.31860/2712-7591-2021-2-108-124; EDN: RZGUTV.
30. Andersen H. T., Møller-Jensen L., Engelstoft S. The End of Urbanization? Towards a New Urban Concept or Rethinking Urbanization. European Planning Studies, 2011: 19(4): 595–611. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548472.
31. Colloredo-Mansfeld R., Ordoñez A. et. al. Conflicts, Territories, and the Institutionalization of Post-Agrarian Economies on an Expanding Tourist Frontier in Quilotoa, Ecuador. World Development, 2018: 101: 441–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.001
32. Du Toit A. Post‐Agrarian Biopolitics. Development and Change, 2017: 6(48): 1464–1477. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12350.
33. Duck L. A. Postsouthern and (Increasingly) Post-Agrarian. Contemporary Literature, 2006: 2(47): 299–303.
34. Halfacree K. Heterolocal Identities? Counter‐Urbanisation, Second Homes, and Rural Consumption in the Era of Mobilities. Population, Space and Place, 2012: 18(2): 209–224. DOI: 10.1002/psp.665.
35. Hisano S., Akitsu M., McGreevy S. R. Revitalising rurality under the neoliberal transformation of agriculture: Experiences of re-agrarianisation in Japan. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018: 61: 290–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.01.013.
36. Ioffe G., Nefedova T., Kirsten D. B. Land Abandonment in Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2012: 53: 4: 527–549. DOI: 10.2747/1539-7216.53.4.527.
37. Lyall A., Colloredo-Mansfeld R. The evolving force of community: peasant uprisings and post-agrarian aspirations in Ecuador. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2024: 7: 51: 1606–1625. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2024.2304799.
38. Miller J. W. A Post-Agrarian Regionalism for Appalachia. Appalachian Heritage: 2014: 2(8): 58–71. DOI: 10.1353/aph.1980.0060.
39. Monllor Rico N. Explorant la jove pagesia: camins, pràctiques i actituds en el marc d’un nou paradigma agrosocial. Estudi comparatiu entre el sud-oest de la província d’Ontario i les comarques gironines. Girona, Universitat de Girona, 2011: 440.
40. Monllor Rico N., Fuller A. M. Newcomers to farming: Towards a new rurality in Europe. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 2016: 62: 3: 531–551. DOI: 10.5565/rev/dag.376.
41. Rinck J. Speculative Futures: Migration, Real Estate, and Post-Agrarian Imaginaries in Nepal. American Anthropological Association, 2022: 23. DOI: 10.48448/hvrk-v966.
42. Salamon S. From Hometown to Nontown: Rural Community Effects of Suburbanization. Rural Sociology, 2003: 1: 68: 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00126.x.
43. Nefedova T. G., Treivish A. I. Old-Developed Regions of Russia: The Main Evolutionary Outcomes. Reg. Res. Rus., 2022: 12: 1: 218–225. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522700411.
44. Sizykh A., Voronin V., Gritsenyuk A., Shekhovtsov A. Forests Formation on Post-Agrarian Territories of Tunka Depression (South-Western Pre-Baikal, Russia). International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science, 2020: 2: 10: 409–420. DOI: 10.31407/ijees10.222.
45. Tobiasz-Lis P., Wójcik M. Tacit knowledge of places. Experiences from the post-agrarian countryside. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 2024: 63: 8–16. DOI: 10.12775/bgss-2024-0001.
46. van der Ploeg J. D. The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London, Earthscan, 2009: 356.
47. Woods M. Rural. London, Routledge, 2011: 336.