ISSN online: 2221-1616

Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii)

Research Article

Kirill V. Podyachev Candidate of Political Science
Institute of sociology of the FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
kirvik@bk.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0002-1342-7076
On the application of the visual-intuitive method in sociological research of Russian local communities.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 201-228

Дата поступления статьи: 20.10.2025
Topic: Methodological Issues

For citation:
On the application of the visual-intuitive method in sociological research of Russian local communities. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 201-228
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2025.16.4.6. EDN: TTYJDC



Abstract

This article substantiates the application of the author's visual-intuitive research method, called "phenomenological immersion," to the study of Russian local communities. This method was developed based on the author's fieldwork practices, conducted since 2013. The theoretical basis of the method is the phenomenological sociology of A. Schütz, the concept of the "lifeworld" of J. Habermas, and the developments of visual sociology. According to A. Schütz, everyday life encompasses the maximum possible manifestations of the social. Therefore, direct observation of the everyday life/lifeworld of local communities is considered in this article as a sociological tool that will significantly complement sociological methodologies, especially in terms of studying the general and specific sociocultural characteristics of Russian regions. When identifying the sociocultural characteristics of regions and local communities within a single country (as opposed to cross-national studies), the subtle nuances of social reality are of decisive importance. These nuances can be determined precisely through studying the living environment, for which this method appears to be the most effective. It also provides opportunities for adjusting guidelines for classical qualitative research and more adequately evaluating statistical data. The author provides examples from his personal experience of fieldwork in Russian regions, demonstrating how this method can be used to formulate hypotheses, adjust data from other sources, and amend research programs and working materials. Visual sociology is a significant component of this method, but is not entirely identical to it, as the role of photography is different here. It is not an object or a research tool, but a means of conveying non-formalized data, which is why it is always combined with verbal descriptions. Moreover, unlike non-photographic visual methods, direct observation is not auxiliary but fundamental. The method has significant limitations, such as subjectivity, difficulties in communicating the obtained data, and the complexity of training researchers for the work. However, these can be overcome to some extent, primarily by using the method not in isolation, but in conjunction with other qualitative research methods.

Keywords

Russia, sociology, phenomenology, regions, sociocultural characteristics, local communities, visual analysis, participant observation

References

 

  1. Andreev A. N. The model of application of research photography in the study of social interaction. Sotsiologiya 4M, 2019: 49: 84–130 (in Russ.). EDN: SVMTCA.
  2. Galich L. P., Shushunova T. N. Visual measurement of social world in Sociology. Sotsiologichesky almanakh, 2020: 11: 84–130 (in Russ.). EDN: LPFNJO.
  3. Ionin L. G. Schütz Alfred. Sotsiologicheskaya Encyklopedia [Sociological Encyclopedia]. Ed. by G. Y. Semigin, V. N. Ivanov. Vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl`, 2003: 863 (in Russ.).
  4. Nimenskiy A. V. Photography: From Its Origins and Social Functions to the Formation of Public Opinion. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 2023: 6: 99–103 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2023.6.11; EDN: LPXLHC.
  5. Podyachev K. V. Nizhegorodskaya oblast': industrial'nyy tsentr i khranitel' remesel [Nizhny Novgorod region: an industrial center and keeper of trades]. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2013: 4: 2: 75–90 (in Russ.).
  6. Podyachev K. V. On Studying the Peculiarities of Russian Social Development and Gnoseological Paradigms: Or the Question of the Methodological Basis of Contemporary Sociology. Izvestiya Saratovskogo un-ta. Novaya seriya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2018: 18: 4: 366–372 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18500/1818-9601-2018-18-4-366-372; EDN: VQLCPO.
  7. Podyachev K. V. Qualitative methods and "national sociology": on the issue of theoretical and methodological aspects of studying the characteristics of social processes in Russia. In Problems of modeling social processes: Russia and the countries of the Asia-Pacific region. Ed. by I. G. Kuzina. Vladivostok, DVFU, 2017: 314 (in Russ.). EDN: YQFUKL.
  8. Podyachev K. V., Khaliy I. A. Crimea and city of Sebastopol – regular transformations or stable constancy? Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya: Yezhegodnik. Vyp. 14 [Russia is reforming. Yearbook. Iss. 13]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, Novy Khronograf, 2016: 496 (in Russ.). EDN: WBLZMN.
  9. Siomina M. V., Ganjah A. O. Vizual'naya sotsiologiya i razvitiye sotsiologicheskogo voobrazheniya [Visual Sociology and the Development of Sociological Imagination]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 2008: XI: 2: 15 –167 (in Russ.).
  10. Strelnikova A. V., Vanke A. V. Field study of an industrial district: strategies for collecting and analyzing visual data. Interaktsiya. Interv'yu. Interpretatsiya, 2017: 9: 13: 51–72 (in Russ.). EDN: ZHATQH.
  11. Toshchenko Zh. T. Sociology of Life. Moscow, Unity-Dana, 2016: 399 (in Russ.).
  12. Chernysh M. F. Mass survey instrument: logic and practice of design. Moscow, FNISC RAN, 2024: 304 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-430-7.2024; EDN: BJWSCJ.
  13. Shapieva A. V. The visual dimension of the social world: the experience and potential of photography in sociological research. Ufimsky gumanitarny nauchny forum, 2024: 4: 428–437 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.47309/2713-2358-2024-4-428-437: EDN: HTAKCF.
  14. Shapkina E. V. Application of the visual method in the study of the KEMSMU educational infrastructure formation. Vestnik obshchestvennykh i gumanitarnykh nauk, 2023: 2: 42–50 (in Russ.). EDN: GMEEGP.
  15. Shatzky J. Istoriya sotzilogicheskoy mysli [The history of sociological thought]. Vol. 2. Transl. from Pol. by E. Barzova et al. Moscow, NLO, 2018: 720 (in Russ.).
  16. Shtompka P. Vizualnaya sotsiologiya. Fotografija kak metod issledovaniya [The Visual sociology. Photography as a research method]. Transl. from Pol. by N. V. Morozova. 2nd ed. Moscow, Logos, 2010: 168 (in Russ.).
  17. Encyclopedia of monuments and military graves of Stalingrad. Ed. by A. V. Sitnikov, S. A. Egin. Volgograd, VolGU, 2023: 364 (in Russ.).
  18. Yavlovsky A. Method of analysis of visual material as a field research technique. Uchionye zapiski ZabGU, 2015: 4(63): 53–60 (in Russ.).
  19. Glaser B., Strauss A. L. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, Aldine, 1967: 271.