This paper is devoted to the methods of studying silence as a social phenomenon. As a research object, it is characterised by a high degree of uncertainty, multiple interpretations and even mystifications. Therefore, in order to transfer the issue of silence from abstract discussions to scientific empirical study, it is necessary to determine the relevant methods for its study. This, in turn, is fundamental for overcoming the "uncertainty" that culture imposes on the practices of silence. One of the ways to overcome this is the micro-structural sociological approach to understanding silence as an element of the situation, that is studied in this article. The paper substantiates the relevance of the qualitative strategy for studying silence, analyses the cognitive potential of participant and non-participant observation, interviews, document analysis and conversational analysis in the study of silence. Silence is understood by the author as a fundamentally audible and observable phenomenon. Thus, the methodological analysis conducted in the work, in a broad sense, applies not only to silence, but also to all cultural phenomena that can be “translated” into the language of spatio-temporal certainty and studied as such.

From this understanding of the research object, a set of basic methods for studying silence as a micro-structural phenomenon is constructed. Observation based on understanding the meaning is a key research method. It works with the structure of the situation directly, without influencing it. The methods of interviews and document analysis are additional, but often necessary, due to insufficient access to direct observation by the researcher, as well as due to limit research subjectivity and supplement of information obtained only through personal participation. The methods of conversation analysis and ethnomethodological experiment also prove to be very valuable in solving the above research problems, however, they have more specific functions. Conversation analysis is focused on working with audible and observed silence, on creating an audio (video) recording and a transcript showing the structural arrangement of silence and pauses. The convenience of using this method is limited to the analysis of relatively short-term interaction, such as everyday conversation. Whilst the experiment influences the situation, transforms it, but allows us to find objective and subjective zones of the situation, where silence or its absence are significant elements of the situation.

sociology, silence, interaction situation structure, qualitative strategy, sociology of everyday life, observation, convergent analysis

1. Avgustis I. The Production of Order during Rap Battles: Managing Pauses and Their Absences. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 2017: 16(3): 280–302 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2017-3-280-302; EDN: YTHMIZ.
2. Volkov V. V., Harhordin O. V. Teoriya praktik [Theory of practices]. St. Petersburg, EU v SPb., 2008: 298 (in Russ.).
3. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Transl. from Eng. by Z. Zamchuk, N. Makarova, E. Trifonova. St. Petersburg, Piter, 2007: 335 (in Russ.)
4. Gilevskaya A. Yu. The manifestation and typology of the silence phenomenon in an interview. Idei i novacii, 2018: 6(1): 84–88 (in Russ.). EDN: QYOFCI.
5. Korbut A. M. Turn-Talking: Non-technical Introduction to Conversation Analysis. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 2015: 14(1): 120–141 (in Russ.). EDN: TRRQZZ.
6. Medvedeva K. S. Field work in a monastery: features of participant observation. Zhurnal sociologii i socialnoj antropologii, 2016: 19(1): 59–72 (in Russ.). EDN: VVCCAN.
7. Noelle-Neumann E. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion. Transl. from German. Moscow, Progress-Akademiya, Ves mir, 1996: 352 (in Russ.)
8. Podvoyskiy D. G., Spirkina A. K. In the quiet…, between people…: Silence as a subject of sociological study. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2022: 6: 125–135 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250019659-7; EDN: GRVUVS.
9. Rogozin D. M. Interview Completion Protocol. Interakciya. Intervyu. Interpretaciya, 2023: 15(4): 115–124 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/inter.2023.15.4.6; EDN: AQONVJ.
10. Spirkina A. K. “Silence game” as a form of social interaction. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 2023: 7: 84–92 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250026588-9; EDN: GJWUVH.
11. Spirkina A. K. The role of silence in the production of social order in meditation (on the example of vipassana). Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Sociologiya, 2023: 23(2): 389–403 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-2-389-403; EDN: XSDHTJ.
12. Spirkina A. K. Construction of sociality in the practice of «silence at the coffin». In: Silence. Interpretation of cultural codes: 2023. Ed. by V. Y. Mikhailov. Saratov: IC «Nauka», 2023: 244–257 (in Russ.). EDN: EUOHOU.
13. Starchenko M. S. Molchanka – zhanr detskogo poteshnogo folklora [Silence game – a genre of children’s amusing folklore]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosun-ta, 2011: 218(3): 131–133 (in Russ.). EDN: NUFLTV.
14. Trocuk I. V. Pochemu smeyutsya lyudi – vot v chem vopros. Glenn Ph. laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Why do people laugh - that is the question. Glenn Ph. laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003]. Sociologicheskij zhurnal, 2008: 3: 175–184 (in Russ.). EDN: PFOSCZ.
15. Silence. Interpretation of cultural codes: 2023. Ed. by V. Y. Mikhailov. Saratov, IC «Nauka», 2023: 288 (in Russ.). EDN: EHJELA.
16. Schutz A. Selected works. Transl. from Eng. and Ger. by V. G. Nikolaev, S. V. Romashko, N. M. Smirnova. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2004: 1056 (in Russ.).
17. Christensen H. R., Høeg I. M. et al. Rooms of silence at three universities in Scandinavia. Sociology of Religion, 2019: 80(3): 299–322. DOI: 10.1093/socrel/sry040.
18. Eddy G. An ethnography of the vipassana meditation retreat: a reflexive evaluation of the participant-observer’s meditation experience as an interpretive tool. Fieldwork in religion, 2014: 9(1): 68–86. DOI: 10.1558/fiel.v9i1.68.
19. Pagis M. Evoking equanimity: silent interaction rituals in vipassana meditation retreats. Qualitative sociology, 2015: 38(1): 39–56. DOI: 10.1007/s11133-014-9295-7.
20. Pagis M. Producing intersubjectivity in silence: an ethnographic study of meditation practice. Ethnography, 2010: 11(2): 309–328. DOI: 10.1177/1466138109339041.
21. Presser L. Unsaid: Analyzing Harmful Silences. Oakland, CA, University of California, 2022: 212.
22. Qualitative Studies of Silence: The Unsaid as Social Action. Ed. by Murray A. J., Durrheim K. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019: 310.
23. Rahmani M. S. Goenka’s vipassana movement: from conversion to disaffiliation. In: The Oxford handbook of meditation. Ed. by M. Farias, D. Brazier, M. Lalljee. New York, Oxford University Press, 2019: 629–650. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198808640.013.31.
24. Scheff T. Aggression, hypermasculine emotions and relations: the silence/violence pattern. Irish Journal of Sociology, 2006: 15: 24–39. DOI: 10.1177/079160350601500103.
25. Simmel G. The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies. American Journal of Sociology, 1906: 11(4): 441–498.
26. Vu M. C., Fan Z. Sounds of Silence: The Reflexivity, Self-decentralization, and Transformation Dimensions of Silence at Work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2022: 31(3): 307–325. DOI: 10.1177/10564926211007942.
27. Zerubavel E. The elephant in the room: silence and denial in everyday life. New York, Oxford University Press, 2006: 176.