Balance of work and personal life in the perception of civil servants of the metropolitan megalopolis

The article presents the results of a sociological study to identify the peculiarities of the perception of work-life balance by modern civil servants of the metropolitan megalopolis. As the empirical basis the materials of questionnaires and interviewing carried out by the authors in 2022 in several ministries of the city of Moscow were used. Using modern methods of textual data analysis, the authors visualise with the help of a word cloud the answers of respondents to an open-ended question about their subjective understanding of work-life balance. Such terms as "time", "opportunity" and "family" prevail in the interpretation of the interviewed civil servants, that allows to find out what meaning civil servants put into the concept of work-life balance. Thus, being a subjective phenomenon, this concept is primarily associated with the proportional distribution of time for family and work. Based on the results of the questionnaire survey, the authors distinguish two groups of civil servants who do and do not experience a sense of work-life balance and analyse their socio-demographic characteristics, life priorities, attitude to work, assessments of time resources and level of satisfaction with various life spheres. Representing subjective assessments, the authors note that just over half of the civil service employees surveyed do not experience work-life balance. Statistical analysis showed that the selected groups do not have significant socio-demographic differences. It was also found that civil servants, who differently assess the presence of work-life balance, do not differ significantly in determining the leading life priorities, putting family and work in the foreground. However, statistically significant links were found between subjective indicators of work-life balance and peculiarities of differentiation of work and personal problems, assessment of sufficiency of time for everyday practices and satisfaction with private life. It was found that the state of imbalance is more characteristic of people who note the influence of work on personal affairs, experience a lack of time for everyday private life and are not satisfied with its main components. The interviewing focused on a group of external factors that relate to the conditions of employment, which is important to consider in matters of personnel policy and work organisation in the public service. The obtained materials allowed to consider the existing working regime from the point of view of civil servants, to discuss initiatives for its improvement, opportunities and limitations of remote work.

work-life balance, civil servants, subjective indicators, objective indicators

1. Abramov R. N., Gruzdev I. A., Terentiev E. A. Work-life balance and sources of stress for the academic staff in Russian research universities. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2019: 3: 8–26 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.02; EDN: GCGIOW.
2. Bayteryakovo S. V., Baryshnikova A. V. et al. Personnel Policy in Public Service: Current Problems and Required Changes. Ed. by M. S. Shklyaruk. Moscow, SP RF, CPUR, 2021: 118 (in Russ.).
3. Zvereva I. А. What is Necessary for the Development of the Russian Public Service? Round Table. 24.03.2022. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya, 2022: 2: 7–33 (in Russ.). EDN: KJNMZE.
4. Isupova O. G. Work-life balance among police women in Vologda oblast. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2019: 3: 103—121 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.07; EDN: UXSZXJ.
5. Isupova O. G., Utkina V. V. Women in the civil service in Russia: career, family, reproductive intentions. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2016: 6: 69–88 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.6.05; EDN: YORVMB.
6. Mospan A. N., Osin E. N. et al. Work–life balance in Russian production enterprise employees. Organizacionnaya psixologiya, 2016: 6: 2: 8–29 (in Russ.). EDN: XCHDQD.
7. Panova E. A., Oparina N. N. Russian State Civil Service: Achievements and Trends in Human Resources Policy. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik, 2019: 73: 305–324 (in Russ.). EDN: DLELIS.
8. Rozhdestvenskaya E. YU. Koncepciya balansa zhizni i truda: uroki evropejskoj social'noj politiki i rossijskie perspektivy [The Concept of Work-life balance: Lessons from European Social Policy and Russian Perspectives]. Zhurnal issledovanij social'noj politiki, 2011: 9: 4: 439–454 (in Russ.). EDN: OOWZRH.
9. Tartakovskaya I. N. Precarious employment and worklife balance: gender aspects. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2019: 3: 163–167 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.10; EDN: DQKKJV.
10. Stroh V. A., Koltsova E. A. Work Life Balance, or is there life after work? Psihologiya v ekonomike i upravlenii, 2012: 2: 30–37 (in Russ.). EDN: SFBUZP.
11. Brown P. Promoting Work/Life Balance in a «Hurry Culture»: Issues and Challenges. Professorial Lecture. Griffith University. 2004. Accessed 12.01.2022. URL: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/368662
12. Frone M. R. Work-Family Balance. In Quick J. C., Tetrick L. E. (eds) Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2003: 162–143. DOI: 10.1037/10474-007.
13. Greenhaus J. H., Collins K. M., Shaw J. D. The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003: 63(3): 510–531. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8.
14. Guest D. E. Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information, 2002: 41(2): 255–279. DOI: 10.1177/0539018402041002005.
15. Haar J. M., Russo M. et al. Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: a study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2014: 85: 361–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010.
16. Zedeck S., Mosier K. L. Work in the family and employing organization. American Psychologist, 1990: 45(2): 240–251. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.45.2.240.