Russian sociologists on the foundations of solidarity: subjectivity, predictability and common feelings

Each concept of solidarity emphasises certain grounds and factors of solidarisation of society, linking them to social changes or, on the contrary, to the constants of human existence. In periods of social change, not only a decrease or increase in the degree of social consolidation takes place, but also a weakening of some forms of solidarity and the formation of others. The purpose of this study is to identify the bases of solidarity related to sociality and anthropological parameters of being. Although forms of solidarity change from society to society and at different historical stages of their development, no society remains viable and progressive in the absence of solidarity. The present study of the foundations of solidarity goes beyond both traditional sociological concepts of integration and disintegration, of normal society and anomie, and psychological theories of group needs and self-expression, that describe only the immediate preconditions and effects of solidarity. The author relies on secondary analysis of sources and theoretical analysis of sociological concepts of sociality and social reproduction. The research materials include publications by Russian scholars from the 19th century, when the first concepts of sobornost', omnipresence and positivist-practical interpretations of solidarity emerged in Russian sociology, to the present day, devoted to the issues of conditions for the formation of solidarity, consolidation and deconsolidation of society. The author identifies explicitly and implicitly present in the sources of understanding about the foundations of solidarity related to the constants of human existence and sociality: subjectivity, predictability and commonality of feelings. The subjectivity of social actors as the highest, reflexive level of subjectivity determines their ability and will to social creativity and actions in favour of the social whole. The predictability of the social environment ensures the majority's adherence to acceptable common rules, belief in common values on the basis of mutual trust and justice. Mutual aid and altruism within solidarity communities are considered as impossible without the third foundation of solidarity - the community of feelings of social subjects, associated with the commonality of their life worlds.

solidarity, Russian society, social practice, social theory, subjectivity, empathic joining

1. Babintsev V. P., Gaidukova G. N., Shapoval Zh. А. Russian university bureaucracy – terra incognita for sociology of education. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Sociologiya, 2022: 22 (4): 895–908 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-4-895-908; EDN: VKBSBW.
2. Babintsev V. P., Gaidukova G. N., Shapoval Zh. А. Solidary foundations of civil society in the Russian region. Obschestvo: sociologiya, psyhologiya, pedagogika, 2020: 4 (72): 14–19 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/spp.2020.4.1; EDN: IREYPH.
3. Berdyaev N. A. Lichnost’ i obshhinnost’ (kommyunotarnost’) v russkom soznanii [Personality and communality (communotarity) in Russian consciousness]. In Na poroge novoi epohi (1945-1947) [On the Threshold of a New Era. (1945-1947)]. St. Petersburg, RHGI, 1996: 235–261 (in Russ.).
4. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya neravenstva. Pis’ma k nedrugam po social’noy filosofii [The philosophy of inequality: Letters to my сontemners]. Мoscow, AST, 2010: 352 (in Russ.).
5. Blum A., Mespule M. Byurokraticheskaya anarkhiya: Statistika i vlast' pri Staline [Bureaucratic anarchy: statistics and power under Stalin] Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2006: 328 (in Russ.).
6. Bogdanov A. A.  Tectology: Universal organization science. Moscow, Akadem. proyekt, 2020: 712 (in Russ.).
7. Volkov Yu. G. Society of trauma: in search of healing (invitation to the discussion). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 9: 16–27 (in Russ.). DOI 10.31857/S013216250009344-1; EDN: TCMBRG.
8. Volkov Yu. G. Private space as a research problem of sociological reflection of new social reality. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017: 12: 20–29 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517120030; EDN: ZWLWCR.
9. Volkov Yu. G. Solidary activity in Russian society: creative practices. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017: 2: 41–48 (in Russ.). EDN: VVALKH.
10. Golovic R. The ‘sobornost’: from the history of Russian religious and social thought. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 5: 121–125 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009389-0; EDN: VTCQAR.
11. Gofman A. B. Solidarity or rules, Durkheim or Hayek? On two forms of social integration. In Tradition, solidarity and sociological theory. Selected texts. Ed. by A. B. Gofman. Moscow, Novyj Hronograf, 2015: 160–248 (in Russ.).
12. Dyakova V. V. Solidarity in the context of regional identity analysis (based on the results of a sociological study). Teoriya i praktika social’nogo razvitiya, 2021: 12(166): 30–34 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2021.12.3; EDN: TLYVAJ.
13. Efremenko D. V., Dolgov A. Y., Evseeva Y. V. Russia between system catastrophes and evolutionary transformations: aspects of political ontology. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2017: 5: 24–42 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.03; EDN: ZGSQIB.
14. Zenkovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii [The history of Russian philosophy]. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. P. 2. Leningrad, Ego, 1991: 280 (in Russ.)
15. Ivanenko E. A. Change.org as a form of casual politics. Analysis of Russian-language petitions. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2022: 2: 52–67 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.02.05; EDN: JSJTCJ.
16. Ivanov V. I. Legion i sobornost’ [Legion and sobornost’]. In Sobraniye sochineniy: v 4 t. T. 3 [Collected works: in 4 vol. Vol. 3]. Ed. by D. V. Ivanov, O. Deshart (Shor). Brussel, Foyer Oriental Chrétien, 1979: 253–261 (in Russ.).
17. Ivanov V. I. Rodnoye i vselenskoye [Native and universal]. Мoscow, Respublika, 1994: 428 (in Russ.).
18. Karmadonov O. A. Norms and empathy as factors of social transformations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2012: 4: 17–25 (in Russ.). EDN: OYSNGT.
19. Karmadonov O. A., Zverev M. K. Konsolidatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva: potoki i pregrady [Consolidation of Russian Society: Flows and Obstacles]. Irkutsk, IGU, 2012: 223 (in Russ.).
20. Kemerov V. E. Obshchestvo, sotsial’nost’, polisub’yektnost’ [Society, Sociality, Polysubjectivity]. Мoscow, Akadem. proyekt, 2012: 252 (in Russ.).
21. Klimova S. G. The ideas and practice of solidarity in the volunteer movement. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2013: 6(350): 32–41 (in Russ.). EDN: QZBRDH.
22. Kovrigina G. D., Karmadonov O. A. The non-obvious solidarity: the problem of empirical study of hardly verified social states. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2018: 10(414): 14–23 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250002154-2; EDN: AOPGIS.
23. Kropotkin P. A. Vzaimopomoshch’ kak faktor evolyutsii [Mutual aid: A factor of evolution]. Moscow, Samoobrazovaniye, 2011: 256 (in Russ.).
24. Lubkov A. V., Litvinova I. V., Goncharov M. A. Traditions of solidarity and cooperation in the space of Moscow higher women’s courses. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 2022: 1(1): 11–20 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31862/2073-9613-2022-1-11-20; EDN: NUAQUS.
25. Marx K. The Poverty of Philosophy. Answer to the Philosophy of poverty by M. Proudhon. Moscow, AST, 2020: 220 (in Russ.).
26. Mechnikov L. I. Tsivilizatsiya i velikiye istoricheskiye reki [Civilization and the great historical rivers]. Moscow, Veche, 2021: 288 (in Russ.).
27. Molodov O. B. Social consolidation in the new reality: the problem of social activity and identity of regional population. Problemy razvitiya territoriy, 2016: 2(82): 82–97 (in Russ.). EDN: VSENMB.
28. Ogorodov A. S., Saranchuk S. Y., Chevtaeva N. G. Corporate professional unity under the unstable labor market in the industrial region. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Sociologiya, 2017: 17(1): 83–95 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2017-17-1-83-95. EDN: XWEZDR.
29. Petukhov V. V. Civil society and participatory democracy. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny, 2006: 1(77): 22–26 (in Russ.). EDN: PCQDQH.
30. Pushkareva G. V, Kuznetsov I. I., Batovrina E. V. Specifics of Russian students inclusion into the social solidarity relationships. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2021: 10: 125–131 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250012813-7; EDN: IBOBYQ.
31. Reutov E. V., Reutova M. N. et al. “Kul’tura nedoveriya” v regional’nom sotsiume: faktory i sotsial’nyye praktiki [“Culture of distrust” in regional society: factors and social practices]. Belgorod, ID “Belgorod” NIU BelGU, 2013: 176 (in Russ.).
32. Ryskeldiyeva L. T. In defence of Smysl and its logic. Filosofskii zhurnal, 2022: 15(4): 26–34 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-4-26-34; EDN: IGNZTL.
33. Sokovikov S. S., Zaikova O. N. On the place of identity, diversity and solidarity in modern cultural policy: problems of articulation of concepts. Vestnik YuUrGU . Ser. “Social’no-gumanitarnye nauki”, 2022: 22(1): 78–85 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14529/ssh220110; EDN: EYKNHZ.
34. Solovyov V. S. Ocherki po istorii russkogo soznaniya [Essays on the history of Russian consciousness]. Vestnik Evropy, 1889: 11: 363–388 (in Russ.).
35. Sorokin P., Froumin I. “Structure-Agency” problem in the XXI century: social development and research implications. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 7: 27–36 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009571-1; EDN: FQYGNL.
36. Toshchenko Zh. T. Society of trauma: Between Evolution and Revolution (Experience of theoretical and applied analysis). Moscow, Ves Mir, 2020: 352 (in Russ.). EDN: QLXXDD.
37. Trofimova I. N. Structure and dynamic of institutional trust in contemporary Russian society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017: 5: 68–75 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.9.24107; EDN: YQRHEV.
38. Filippov A. F. Mobil’nost’ i solidarnost’. Stat’ya vtoraya [Mobility and solidarity. Article second]. Sociological review, 2012: 11(1): 19–39 (in Russ.). EDN: OZNZWP.
39. Khaliy I. A. Sovremennyye obshchestvennyye dvizheniya: innovatsionnyy potentsial rossiyskikh preobrazovaniy v traditsionalistskoy srede [Contemporary social movements: The innovative potential of Russian transformations in the traditionalist environment]. Moscow, IS RAN, 2007: 300 (in Russ.).
40. Yanitskiy O. N. Ekologicheskoye dvizheniye v Rossii. Kriticheskiy analiz [Ecological movement in Russia. Critical analysis]. Moscow, IS RAN, 1996: 216 (in Russ.).
41. Babintsev V. P., Gaidukova G. N., Shapoval Zh. А. Consolidation of territorial communities as a social project. Revista de investigaciones Universidad del Quindío, 2022: 34(S3): 134–141. DOI: 10.33975/riuq.vol34nS3.990.
42. Demintseva E. Understanding Russia’s brain drain in the 2010s. Problems of Post-Communism, 2021: 68(6): 521–530. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1905533.
43. Efremenko D., Evseeva Y. Studies of social solidarity in Russia: tradition and modern trends. The American sociologist, 2012: 43: 349–365. DOI: 10.1007/s12108-012-9165-2.
44. Poletaev D. V. From mistrust to solidarity or more mistrust? Russia’s migration experience in the international context. Russia in global affairs, 2019: 17(1): 171–200. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-1-171-200.
45. Sirazetdinova M. F., Stoletov A. I., Lukmanova R. Kh. Manipulation, individuation, and the Self. Cogito, 2021: XIII(4): 102–123. Accessed 01.03.2023 http://cogito.ucdc.ro/COGITO_DECEMBER_2021.pdf
46. Vavilina N. D. Solidaritization as a social phenomenon and social process: regional context. Regional research of Russia, 2020: 10: 431–442. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970520030144.
47. Yanitskiy O. On the volunteers and volunteering: the case of Russia. Creative education, 2020; 11: 307–320. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2020.113024.
48. Zalivanskiy B., Samokhvalova E., Golikova I. Factors determining character of solidarity in Russian region. In European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Research paradigms transformation in Social Sciences. Ed. by I. B. Ardashkin, N. V. Martyushev et al. London, Future Academy, 2018: 35: 837–845. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.99.