Volume 13 Issue 2 was published. 
The main theme of the issue: Civic engagement in Russia: institutions and motivations 

The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2022. Vol. 13. No 2 published 07/11/2022
2022. Vol. 13. No 2 published 06/28/2022
2022. Vol. 13. No 1 published 03/31/2022
2021. Vol. 12. No 4 published 12/27/2021
All Issue:

2022 ( Vol. 13)  |  2   2   1  
2021 ( Vol. 12)  |  4   3   2   1  
2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  4   3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

The social status of Russian youth: ideas and reality

Svetlana V. Mareeva Candidate of Sociology Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia,
mailto: s.mareeva@gmail.com
ORCID ID=0000-0002-2057-8518
The social status of Russian youth: ideas and reality.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2022. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 158-183

Дата поступления статьи: 26.04.2022
Topic: elf-esteem and value preferences of Russian youth

For citation:
Mareeva S. V.. The social status of Russian youth: ideas and reality. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2022. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 158-183
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2022.13.2.800. EDN: QINHEL


This article examines the features of the social status of modern youth in its objective and subjective dimensions. The objective social statuses of young people are characterised by the position of their representatives in the key hierarchies in terms of education level, professional positions and income level. It is shown that the level of education of the Russian youth has increased noticeably over the past twenty years; the socio-professional structure of the youth group also underwent certain changes, reflected in a decrease in the proportion of the unemployed, as well as workers of various skill levels, in its composition. The space of socio-professional statuses of young people does not demonstrate significant differences compared to Russians of middle and older ages, and this is also typical for models of income stratification of these groups. In general, speaking about the space of the objective statuses of young people in modern Russian society, it can be stated that young people are not in a disadvantaged position in this respect due to the specifics of this stage of the life cycle - on the contrary, already in the youth group one can observe the existing configuration of the social structure, that is also characteristic of Russians of working age as a whole (that is reflected, in particular, in a similar share of the middle class in these groups). With regard to subjective statuses, young Russians, like citizens in general, tend to place themselves in middle positions in society. However, the position they consider “fair” for themselves, as well as their desired position, turn out to be much higher than the current one, that can also lead to the accumulation of discontent, since it reflects obviously unrealistic expectations regarding social mobility. And although young Russians are quite positive about the medium-term future, their expectations for the next 2-3 years are more restrained. A negative indicator is the fact that young people share with adult Russians a sense of the unfairness of the structure of Russian society, and these perceptions have little to do with their objective statuses. At the same time, young Russians see principles related to the instrumentalisation of the principle of equal opportunities as key elements of a just society.


sociology, youth, social status, middle class, subjective social status, justice, equality of opportunity

  1. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Returns to education in Russia: Nowhere below? Voprosy ekonomiki, 2021: 8: 37–68 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-37-68
  2. Maleva Т. М., Burdyak А. Ya., Tyndik А. О. Middle classes at different stages of life course. Zhurnal Novoj jekonomicheskoj associacii, 2015: 27(3): 109–138 (in Russ.). 
  3. Mareeva S. V. Monetary inequality in Russia in the sociological dimension. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2020: 11(3): 78–98 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.3.664
  4. Mareeva S. V. Social justice and inequalities in views of Russians. Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovaniy, 2015: 7(2): 109–119 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2015.7.2.109-119
  5. Mareeva S. V., Slobodenyuk E. D. Inequality in Russia on the background of other countries: income, wealth, opportunities. Analytical report. HSE University. Moscow, NIU VSHE, 2021. Assessed 10.04.2022. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2022/03/14/1808800660/02_Mareeva_Inequality_in_Russia_NCMU_Site_03-2022.pdf (in Russ.).
  6. Model' dohodnoj stratifikacii rossijskogo obshhestva: dinamika, faktory, mezhstranovye sravnenija [Income stratification model of the Russian society: dynamics, factors, cross-country comparisons]. Ed. by N. Tikhonova. Moscow, Nestor Istoriya, 2018: 368 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.317544469-1419-7
  7. Petukhov V. V. Ideological and political preferences of the Russians: changing of the discourse. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 2020: 8(4): 25–43 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2020.8.4.7654
  8. Pishnyak A. I. The population dynamics and mobility of the middle class in Russia, 2000–2017. Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiya, etnologiya, 2020: 29(4): 57–84 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-4-57-84
  9. Rimskij V. L. Justice in contemporary Russia: dreams and use in social practices. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2013: 5: 27–36 (in Russ.).
  10. Srednij klass v sovremennoj Rossii. Opyt mnogoletnih issledovanij [The middle class in modern Russia. The experience of long-term research]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2016: 368 (in Russ.). 
  11. Tikhonova N. E. Consequences of the 2020–2021 crisis for different professional groups in Russian society. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2021: 27(2): 46–67 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2021.27.2.8086
  12. Tikhоnova N. Е. Various theoretical approaches to the Russian middle class: thresholds and internal structure. Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiya, etnologiya, 2020: 29(4): 34–56 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-4-34-56
  13. Tikhоnova N. Е. Life success and social status factors in the minds of Russian. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2018: 9(4): 11–43 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.27.4.536
  14. Cojocaru A. Fairness and inequality tolerance: evidence from the Life in Transition survey. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2014: 42 (3): 590–608. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2014.01.003
  15. Gimpelson V., Treisman D. Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 2018: 30(1): 27–54. DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12103
  16. Hauser O. P., Norton M. I. (Mis) perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2017: 18: 21–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.024
  17. Hirschman A., Rothschild M. The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973: 87(4): 544–566.
  18. Krijnen J. M., Ülkümen G., Bogard J. E., Fox C. R. Lay theories of financial well-being predict political and policy message preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2022: 122(2): 310–336. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000392
  19. Larsen C. How three narratives of modernity justify economic inequality. Acta Sociologica, 2016: 59(2): 93–111. DOI: 10.1177/0001699315622801
  20. Loveless M. The Deterioration of Democratic Political Culture: Consequences of the Perception of Inequality. Social Justice research, 2013: 26: 471–491. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-013-0198-7
  21. Schneider S. Why Income Inequality Is Dissatisfying. Perceptions of Social Status and the Inequality-Satisfaction Link in Europe. European Sociological Review, 2019: 35(3): 409–430. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcz003
  22. Wilkinson R., Pickett K. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London, Allen Lane, 2009: 330.

Content 2022' 41