The social community of parents as a part of civil society

The traditional subjects of civil society, which have been active for a long period of time, are losing their former influence and importance. Researchers point out a decrease in the population’s civil engagement in many countries of the world. The existing concepts of civil society are losing their explanatory power. This article presents an attempt to resolve the issue in question. The purpose of this article is to analyze the social community of parents as a new subject of civil society. In order to achieve this goal, civil society is examined from a community approach standpoint, according to which it is interpreted as a special form of social community. Its specific nature is conditioned by the fact that such a community consists of individuals (and their associations) which support distinct needs, interests and value orientations. It is shown that individuals (and their associations), when possessing the necessary resources (mainly social capital), engage in cooperative actions to fulfill and protect their needs and interests within certain boundaries of time and space. The article stresses the fact that such activity turns into a dominant model of living, in other words – a lifestyle for members of a civil society community. Analyzed are the key characteristics, functions and the structure of civil society as a social community, together with the creation and development of a parent community within it as a new element of the former. This serves as a foundation for demonstrating that the modern parent community is evolving. While preserving its traditional community features and functions, the social community of parents is acquiring more traits and functions inherent to a civil society community, transforming into a special type of the latter. The gradual process of integrating the parent social community into the community structure of civil society is shown. Also highlighted is the fact that this process is occurring with varying intensity in time and space, as a result of the non-uniformity and inconsistency of the parent community itself. The objective disparity between parents affects their degree of involvement in practices of civil society, as well as the nature of interactions within and between communities. The article suggests regarding the interior structure of the parent community as dynamic, consisting of a core, semi-periphery and periphery. The conclusion states that in modern conditions the parent community turns into what drives the development of civil society.

civil society, community approach, parenthood, power characteristics, community structure of civil society, community interactions

Asymmetry of life in modern Russian society: correlation of traditions and innovations. Ed. by O.V. Aksenova. Moscow, FCTAS RAS publ., 2017: 207. Available at:  http://www.isras.ru/index. php?page id=1198&id=5084 [accessed: 28.11.19] (In Russ.).

Babincev V. P. Problems of consolidation of local communities. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii = Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 2016: 2 (17): 46–65. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2016.17.2.396 (In Russ.).

Barsukova S. Y. Informal economy. Informal economy: economic and sociological analysis. Moscow, SU HSE publ., 2004: 448 (In Russ.).

Bebiroğlu N. From family to society: the role of parenting behaviors in promoting youth civic engagement. Medford (Mass.), Tufts university, 2009: 128.

Bezrukova O. N. Models of parenthood and parent potential: intergenerational analysis. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2014: 9: 85–97 (In Russ.).

Ble M.-K. Solidarity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies, 2018; 8:12–21. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250000757-5 (In Russ.).

Bojarskikh A. V. Application of sociological technologies in the study of the structure of civil society. Politika i obschestvo = Politics and Society, 2014: 2 (110): 132–139 (In Russ.).

Bourdieu P. Beginnings. Moscow: Socio-Logos, 1994: 288 (In Russ.).

Chernyshov A.G. Parents as citizens. Vlast' = Power, 2019: 1 (27): 47–54. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i1.6197 (In Russ.).

Coleman G. Social and Human Capital. Obshhestvennye nauki I sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Modernity, 2001: 3:121–139 (In Russ.).

Dudkina A. A. Structures of civil society in the political process of our time: actual problems of theory and practice. Politika, economika I social'naja sfera: problem vzaimodeystvija = Politics, Economics and social sphere: problems of interaction, 2016: 2: 41–45 (In Russ.).

Etzioni A. Communitarianism. The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology 2006. Available at: https://www2.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/documents/A359.pdf [accessed 16.01.2019].

Etzioni A. New Communitarian Thinking. Charlottesville (Va.), The University of Virginia Press, 1995: 313.

Etzioni A. The Good Society. Seattle Journal of Social Justice, 2002: 1 (1). Available at: https://www2.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/A296.pdf [accessed 16.01.2019].

Filipova A. G., Rakitina N. E., Kupriashkina E. A. New research orientations in the sociology of childhood. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies, 2018: 3: 86–93. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518030091 (In Russ.).

Flanagan C. A., Bowes J. M., Jonsson B., Csapo B., Sheblanova E. Ties that bind: correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 1998: 54 (3): 457–475.

Fletcher А. C., Elder G. H, Mekos D. Parental influences on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of research on adolescence, 2000: 10: 29–48.

Florida R. Who is your city? Creative economy and choice of residence. Moscow, Strelka Press, 2014: 368 (In Russ.).

France rallies against replacing «Dad and mom "with" parent 1 and parent 2». AF Media website. Available at: http://afmedia.ru/406 [accessed: 06.10.19] (In Russ.).

Fukuyama F. Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity. Moscow, ACT, 2004: 730 (In Russ.).

Giddens A. The structure of society: an essay on the theory of structuration. Moscow, Academic Project, 2005: 528 (In Russ.).

Gorshkov M. K. Civil society and civil consciousness in modern Russia. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii = Humanities of the Russian South, 2013: 1: 12–22 (In Russ.).

Gorshkov M. K. Civil society and civil culture in modern Russia: experience of sociological diagnostics (instead of Preface). Rossiya reformiruyuschayasia = Russia Reforming: 11. Moscow, IS RAS publ., 2012: 3–26 (In Russ.).

Gurko T. A. Marriage and parenthood in Russia. Moscow, IS RAS, 2008: 325 (In Russ.).

Gurko T. A. Quality of parenthood in young families: conceptual framework, strategy, and sample research. Aktual'nye problem roditel'stva v Rossii = Actual Problems of Parenthood in Russia. Moscow, 2013: 8–28 (In Russ.).

Haddad M. A. Civic Responsibility and Patterns of Voluntary Participation Around the World. 2006. WesScholar website. Available at: http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/div2facpubs/166 [accessed: 26.01.18].

Kirdina S. G. Civil society: a departure from the ideologies. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies, 2012: 2: 63–73 (In Russ.).

Levashov V. K. Has civil society taken place in Russia? Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya = Monitoring of Public Opinion, 2006: 2(78): 54–62 (In Russ.).

McNutt J. New Communitarian Thought and the Future of Social Policy. The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 1997: l–24 (4). Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol24/iss4/5 [accessed: 26.01.19].

Mersijanova I. V., Malakhov D. I., Ivanova N. V. The role of the family as a channel of intergenerational transmission of volunteering traditions in modern Russia. Economicheskaja sociologija = Economic Sociology, 2019: 3 (20): 66–98 (In Russ.).

Molokova M. A. Organizations of the "third sector" as a "point of growth" of the potential of civil society in modern Russia. Teorija I praktika obschestvennogo razvitija = Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2011; 6: 177–181 (In Russ.).

«Parent 1» et «parent 2» à l'école: «Une mesure injuste pour la plupart des familles!». Le Figaro Official website. URL:http://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/societe/2019/02/13/31003-20190213... [accessed: 06.10.19] (in French).

Pavlova М. К., Silbereisen R. K., Ranta M., Salmela-Aro K. Warm and supportive parenting can discourage offspring’s civic engagement in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2016; 45 (11): 2197–2217.

Pol R. Revolution in school. A new solution for a broken education system. Saint-Petersburg, Piter, 2015: 208 (In Russ.).

Rossi G., Lenzi M., Sharkey J., Vieno A., Santinello M. Factors associated with civic engagement in adolescence: the effects of neighborhood, school, family, and peer context. Journal of Community Psychology, 2016: 44 (8): 1040–1058.

Sasaki M., Davydenko V.A., Latov Y.V., Romashkin G.S., Latova N.V. Problems and paradoxes of institutional trust as an element of social capital of modern Russia. Zhurnal institucional'nykh issledovaniy = Journal of Institutional Research, 2009: 1 (1): 20–35 (In Russ.).

Scientific notes of FCTAS RAS. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, FCTAS RAS publ., 2019: 64 (In Russ.).

Shpakovskaja L. L. Discursive practices of parenthood: political challenges and actual problems. Vestnik TomGU. Philosophia. Sotsiologija. Politologija = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2013: 1 (21): 236–248 (In Russ.).

Sievers B. What Is Civil Society? GIA Reader, 2009: 20 (1). Available at: https://www.giarts.org/article/what-civil-society [accessed: 19.06.18].

Updated values of modern Russian society. Ed. by I. A. Khaliy. Moscow, IS RAS publ., 2019: 273 (In Russ.).

Vozmitel A. A. Conceptual foundations of sociology of lifestyle. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii = Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 2017: 4 (8): 13–44. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2017.23.4.479 (In Russ.).

Wellman B. The place of relatives in the system of personal ties. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies. 2000: 6: 78–87 (In Russ.).

Yadov V. A., Klimova S. G., Khaliy I. A., Klimov I. A., Kinsburskiy A. V., Topalov M. N., Klement K. M. The social base of support for reforms and the potential of mass protest. In: Rossija v global'nykh processakh: poisk I perspektivy. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, IS RAS publ., 2008: 85–101 (In Russ.).

Yanitsky O. N. Modernization in Russia and around: synopsis. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2011: 5: 136–145 (In Russ.).

Yanitsky O. N. Professional civil organizations: experience of integrative interpretation. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika = Sociological science and social practice, 2015: 2 (10): 70–87 (In Russ.).

Yanitsky O. N. Social movements in modern society: questions of theory. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies, 2013: 3: 50–59 (In Russ.).

Zborovskiy G. E. Theory of social community. Ekaterinburg, University of Humanities publ., 2009: 304 (In Russ.).