Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia
Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
This article considers the image of a corrupt official as perceived by young Russians. The object of this study was represented by students from three Moscow-based universities. The survey was carried out in 2018. The sample consisted of 118 people ages 17 to 21. The results of the analysis show that, in order to develop anti-corruption measures in the field of education, it is necessary to study those personal, professional and behavioral image characteristics of a corrupt official which are relevant to young people. With this goal in mind, a sociological study was conducted in 2018 utilizing the unfinished sentences method, with students from three Russian universities participating in the study. The results of the study reflect a multilevel collective image, defined by the behavioral characteristics of a corrupt official. A conclusion was drawn that, while describing individual traits of a corrupt official, personal qualities, field of professional activities and means of interacting with others bear special significance. In recreating an image, the mentality and willpower of corrupt officials are shown in a light which points to mixed attitudes towards the person initiating acts of corruption. Meanwhile certain areas are highlighted where said image becomes somewhat blurred, with corrupt officials being regarded as “regular” people without any distinctive traits. It is suggested that these thoroughly analyzed substantive qualities of the image of a corrupt official should be considered while developing measures for cultivating intolerant attitudes among young people towards the main subjects of acts of corruption.
corruption, perception of corruption, image of a corruptionist, methodof incomplete sentences, youth
Barsukova S. Yu. Corruption: Academic Debates and the Russian Reality. Obshchestvennye nauki I sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2008; 5:36–47 (In Russ.).
Bicchieri C., Ganegoda D. Determinants of Corruption: A Sociopsychological Analysis. In: Nichols P., Robertson D. (Eds.). Thinking about Bribery: Neuroscience, Moral Cognition and the Psychology of Bribery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017:177–178.
De Graaf G., Wagenaar P., Hoenderboom M. Constructing corruption. In: G. de Graaf, P. von Maravic, P. Wagener (Eds.). The Good Cause. Theoretical Perspectives on Corruption. Barbara Budrich Publishers. Opladen & Farmington Hills, 2010:98–114.
Dimant E. The Nature of Corruption: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Economics Discussion Papers; 2013:59, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. URL: http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2013-59 [accessed: 15.10.2018].
Dupuy K., Neset S. The Cognitive Psychology of Corruption. Micro-level Explanations for Unethical Behavior, U4 Issue 2018: 2. URL: https://www.u4.;/publications/the-cognitive-psychology-of-corruption/pdf [accessed: 15.10.2018].
Karepova S. G., Nekrassov S. V., Pinchuk A. N. On the Interpretation of the Concept “Corruption”: Societal and Socio-Psychological Aspects. Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniya = Horizons of humanitarian knowledge, 2018; 2:52–64 (In Russ.).
Osipov G., Karepova S., Pinchuk A., Nekrassov S. Corruption Potential as a Special Phenomenon: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis. Proceedings of the 32nd International Business Information Management Association Conference – Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic Development and Application of Innovation Management from Regional expansion to Global Growth, 15–16 November 2018, Seville, Spain, 2018:1257–1266.
Papakostas A. Civilizing the Public Sphere: Trust, Distrust and Corruption. Moscow: Russian Public Opinion Research Center, 2016. 224 p. (In Russ.).
Puzanova ZH. V. "Loneliness" as a Subject of Empirical Analysis. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie (4M) = Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (4M), 2009; 29:132–154 (In Russ.).
Tatarova G. G., Burlov А. V. Logical Organization for Analyzing Data Obtained by Method of Incomplete Sentences. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 1999; 8:123–133 (In Russ.).
Tänzler D. Cultures of Corruption – An Empirical Approach to the Understanding of Crime. Discussion Paper Series, 2007, 2. URL: https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/11454/Discussion_Paper_;_2_Dirk_Taenzler_June_2007.pdf?sequence=1 [accessed: 15.10.2018].
Thesaurus of Sociology. Book 2. Methodology and methods of research in social science: a subject-based dictionary and reference book. Ed. by ZH.T. Toshchenko. Moscow, IuNITI-DАNА Publ., 2013. 415 p. (In Russ.).
Zhuravlev A. L., Yurevich A. V. The psychological factors of corruption. Psihologiya v ehkonomike i upravlenii = Psychology in economy and management, 2012; 1:57–66 (In Russ.).