Volume 12 Issue 4 was published. 
The main theme of the issue: Risks of Interethnic Conflicts in the Context of Contemporary Social Transformations
The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2021. Vol. 12. No 4 published 12/27/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 3 published 09/30/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 2 published 06/30/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 1 published 04/01/2021
All Issue:

2021 ( Vol. 12)  |  4   3   2   1  
2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  4   3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

Everyday household activities: essential and indispensible unpaid labor performed by urban workers

Tatyana M. Karakhanova Candidate of Economics Leading researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
mailto: patruhev@isras.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0002-6497-9188
Olga A. Bolshakova Candidate of Sociology Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
mailto: patruhev@isras.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0003-2501-6001
Everyday household activities: essential and indispensible unpaid labor performed by urban workers.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 100-129

DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.25.2.512

This Article is downloaded: 25 times
Topic: Social Strata and Groups: Attitudes and Activity

For citation:
T. M. Karakhanova., O. A. Bolshakova. Everyday household activities: essential and indispensible unpaid labor performed by urban workers. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 100-129
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2018.25.2.512


 This article is dedicated to the results of examining workers’ actual behavior in the realm of everyday household activity, which comprises a considerable portion of a laborer’s work load. Data from a comprehensive study of laborers’ household activities (including information on their time budget), conducted in 2014 at industrial enterprises in five Russian regional capital cities (Bryansk, Vladimir, Kirov, Omsk, Pskov), was used as an empirical foundation for analysis. Defined is the degree of household activities’ subjective importance, and the various practices which they include. Determined are their scope and structure, expressed in temporal parameters, as well as factors which affect verbal and actual behavior within the realm of fulfilling everyday needs. Analyzed are the dynamics and prospects of optimizing household activity. It is revealed that subjective perception of everyday household activities among workers (both male and female) is more of a testament to both genders’ high degree of willingness to attend to household chores. Actual practice (time budget data) also shows that workers, regardless of their gender, partake in all sorts of household chores, and for the most part they organize their household priorities in the same manner, within the limits of various amounts of time dedicated to these tasks. An analysis of gardening work is conducted, along with other sorts of land site labor. Examined are subjective assessments and objective measures of urban workers’ behavior within this particular group of household activity, as well as the “branch” composition of agricultural production. Revealed are workers’ attitudes (declared and actual) towards such a socially significant activity as “taking care of and raising children”. Also analyzed is the connection between the time which workers dedicate to household work (including going to stores, using services, agricultural labor), to taking care of and raising their children, and workers’ social characteristics (marital status, family size, amount of income) and their value orientations. Drawing comparison throughout the years of reform (1986-2014) of the time workers dedicate to household activities, within the structure of one week’s time budget, shows that men now spend much more time on these activities, while women spend somewhat less. Workers’ satisfaction with household activity in general, and when it comes to separate groups of practices, falls short of a “good” grade; women are generally less satisfied than men.


 urban workers, household, household activity, housekeeping, child care and children education, gardening and kitchen-garden activities, unpaid work.



Artiomov V. A., Balykova N. A., Kalugina Z. I. Vremia naseleniya goroda: planirovanie i ispol'zovanie [Time of the city population: planning and use]. Ed. by V.D. Patrushev. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1982. 200 p. (in Russ.).

Balabanova E.S. Domashniy trud kak simvol gendera i vlasti [Home labor as a symbol of gender and power]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2005, no 6. pp. 109–119 (in Russ.).

Bianchi S., Milkie M., Sayer L., Robinson J. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 2002, Vol. 79, no 1, pp. 191–222.

Bond S., Sales J. Household work in the UK: An analysis of the British household panel survey 1994. Work, Employment & Society, 2001, vol. 15, no 2, pp. 233–250.

Bonke J., McIntosh J. Household time allocation – Theoretical and empirical results from Denmark. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 2005, vol. 2, no 1, pp. 1–12. URL: http:// dx.doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.2.1.1–12.

Craig L., Mullan K. How mothers and fathers share childcare: a cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 2011, vol. 76, no 6, pp. 834–861.

Craig L., Siminski P. If men do more housework, do their wives have more babies? Social Indicators Research, 2011, vol. 101, no 2, pp. 255–258.

Dadaeva T. M. Kto vynosit musor, ili paradoxy gendernogo razdeleniya truda [Who washes dirty linen or paradoxes of gendered labor division]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2005, no 6, pp. 120–126 (in Russ.).

Dadaeva T. M., Bezzubova T. V. Gendernaya struktura domashnego truda: sravnitel'ny analiz gorodskoy i sel'skoy sem'i regiona [Gender structure of domestic work: comparative analysis of urban and rural families in the region]. Regionologiya, 2006, no 1, pp. 145–156 (in Russ.).

Davydova N. M. Glava sem'i: raspredelenie roley i sposob vyzhivaniya [The head of the family: the distribution of roles and the way of survival]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2000, no 4, pp. 51–57 (in Russ.).

Edlund J. The Work-Family Time Squeeze: Conflicting Demands of Paid and Unpaid Work Among Working Couples in 29 Countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48, 2007, no 6, pp. 451–480.

Evstifeeva G. G. Gendernaya struktura domashnego truda v gorodskoy sem'e [Gender structure of domestic work in an urban family]. Regionologiya, 2013, no 1 (82), pp. 93–96 (in Russ.).

Fernandez C., Sevilla-Sanz A. Social norms and household time allocation. Colchester: University of Essex, 2006.

Joesch J., Spiess K. European mothers’ time spent looking after children – Differences and similarities across nine countries. Electronic International Journal of Time-Use Research, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 1–27.

Karakhanova T. M. Domashniy trud kak potrebitel'skaya deyatel'nost' [Home labor as a consumer activity]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii, 2014, no 8, pp. 108–130 (in Russ.).

Karakhanova T. M., Bol'shakova O. A. Biudzhet vremeni rabochikh kak otrazhenie ikh real'nogo povedeniya v povsednevnoy zhizni (1965–2014 gg.) [Laborers Time Budget as a Reflection of Their Actual Behavior in Everyday Life]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 2016, no 3 (18), pp. 70–96. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2016.18.3.413 (in Russ.).

Karakhanova T. M., Bol'shakova O. A. Obschee i osobennoe v ispol'zovanii vremyaresursa povsednevnoy zhizni u rabochikh raznogo vozrasta [The common and the particular in using the time-resource of everyday life among workers of various ages]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii, 2017, no 3 (22), pp. 98–136. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2017.22.3.473 (in Russ.).

Kletsin A. A. Raspredelenie domashnikh obyazannostey mezhdu suprugami: fakty, problemy, interpretatsii [Distribution of household duties between spouses: facts, problems, interpretations]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii, 2003, vol. VI, no 2, pp. 120–136 (in Russ.).

Kul'kova I. A. Izuchenie strategiy trudovogo povedeniya domohoziaystv [The study of strategies of labor behavior of households]. Upravlenets, 2011, no 3–4, pp. 72–77 (in Russ.).

Lytkina T. S. Domashniy trud i gendernoe razdelenie vlasti v sem'e [Domestic work and gender division of power in the family]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2004, no 9, pp. 85–91 (in Russ.).

Radaev V. V., Barsukova S. Y. Printsipy raspredeleniya truda mezhdu suprugami v sovremennoy gorodskoy sem'e [Principles of distribution of labor between spouses in a modern urban family]. Economicheskaya sotsiologiya, 2001, no 2, pp. 23–60 (in Russ.).

Rimashevskaya N. M. Gendernye stereotipy i logika sotsial'nykh otnosheniy [Gender stereotypes and the logic of social relations]. Svobodnaya mysl', 2006, no 3, pp. 100–110 (in Russ.).

Savinskaya O. B. Balans raboty i sem'i: strategii sovmescheniya professional'nykh i semeynykh obyazannostey rabotayuschimi materyami v Moskve [Balance of work and family: strategies for combining professional and family responsibilities of working mothers in Moscow]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii, 2013, vol. XVI, no 2 (67), pp. 142–167 (in Russ.).

Souza-Poza A., Schmid H., Widmer R. The allocation and value of time assigned to housework and child-care: An analysis for Switzerland. Journal of Population Economics, 2001, vol. 14, pp. 599–618.

Zadvornova J. S. Differentsiatsiya domashnego truda v rossiyskoy sem'e: gendernye stereotipy i sovremennye tendentsii [Differentiation of domestic work in the Russian family: gender stereotypes and modern trends]. Zhenschina v rossiyskom obschestve, 2014, no 1 (70), pp. 51–58 (in Russ.).

Zimin V. A., Morozova G. A. Izmenenie sotsial'nykh roley zhenschin v usloviyakh reform [Change in the social roles of women under reform]. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-economicheskie i obschestvennye nauki, 2013, no 6, pp. 70–74 (in Russ.).

Content 2018' 25