Volume 11 Issue 3 was published.
The main theme of the issue: Youth Sociology: Education, and the Vision of the Future
The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2020. Vol. 11. No 3 published 09/29/2020
2020. Vol. 11. No 2 published 06/29/2020
2020. Vol. 11. No 1 published 03/29/2020
2019. Vol. 10. No 4 published 12/12/2019
All Issue:

2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

The proportions of civil order and development

Y.A. Krassin, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor ,
mailto: krasinyua@yandex.ru
The proportions of civil order and development.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 35-51

DOI: 10.19181/vis.2017.21.2.453

This Article is downloaded: 141 times
Topic: Modern Global Shifts in the World and in Russia

For citation:
Y.A. Krassin. The proportions of civil order and development. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 35-51
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2017.21.2.453


Two attributive principles are inherent to society, which ensure social activities: order and creativity. These two principles are in constant conflict with each other, which forces society into searching for an optimal measure of their correlation. The birth of network structuring of society resulted in the need for such an order, which, while guaranteeing the stability of community life, is equipped with a certain mechanism for regulating the interactions of various private interests, which in turn demands an organic unity of public administration and community self-government. Due to Russia’s socio-cultural peculiarities, the country’s integrity together with public order is provided by the presence of a strong centralized state system, which hampers the implementation of democratic community self-government. This raises a certain question: is it possible for Russia’s existing model of power to undergo an evolutionary democratization during the process of its adaptation to an uprising practice of network connections and interactions?


public order, development, informational society, network connections, state rule, community self-government.


Arrow K. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York, London, Sidney, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1963. 124 .

Castells M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK-USA, 2012. 228 p.

Istorija teoreticheskoy sociologii [The History of Theoretical Sociology].Vol. 3. Ed. by Y. N. Davydov. Moscow, Kanon, 1998. 448 p.

Keane J. The Life and Death of Democracy. New York, London, W. W. Norton and Company, 2009. 992 .

Krasin Y. A. Rossiyskaja reformacija: parametry, protivorechija, perspektivy [The Russian Reformation: Parameters, Contradictions, Prospects]. Saarbrucken, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015. 684 p.

Lucrecy Car. O prirode veschey [About the nature of things]. Moscow, AS of USSR publ., 1946. 448 p.

Luman N. Obschestvo kak social'naja sistema [Society as a Social System]. Moscow, Logos, 2004. 232 p.

Luman N. Vvedenie v sistemnuju teoriju [Einfuhrung in die Systemtheorie]. Moscow, Logos, 2007. 360 p.

Marx C. Razlichie mezhdu naturfilosofiey Demokrita i naturfilosofiey Epikura (1839 – mart 1841) [The Difference between the Natural Philosophy of Democritus and the Natural Philosophy of Epicurus]. Marx C., Engels F. Iz rannih proizvedeniy. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, 1956. 689 p.

Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznanija. Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimanija. Moscow, Progress-Tradicija, 2001. 224 p.

Pastuhov V. Russkoe samoderzhavie kak civilizacionny otvet na istorichesky vyzov [Russian Autocracy as a Civilizational Response to the Historic Challenge]. Web portal POLIT.RU. Release 11.12.15. URL: http://polit.ru/article/2015/12/11/autocracy/ [date of visit: 15.04.2017].

Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poriadok iz haosa: Novy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order from Chaos: A New Dialogue between Man and Nature]. Moscow, Progress, 1986. 432 p.

Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Vremia, haos, kvant. K resheniju paradoxa vremeni [Time, Chaos, Quantum. To the Solution of the Paradox of Time]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2001. 238 p.

Russo J.-J. Ob obschestvennom dogovore. Traktaty [On the social contract. Treatises]. Moscow, KANON-press, Kuchkovo pole, 1998. 416 p.

Vasil'kova V. Poriadok i khaos v razvitii social'nykh system [Order and Chaos in the Development of Social Systems]. Saint-Petersburg, Lan', 1999. 478 p.


Content 2017' 21