Volume 13 Issue 2 was published. 
The main theme of the issue: Civic engagement in Russia: institutions and motivations 

The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2022. Vol. 13. No 2 published 07/11/2022
2022. Vol. 13. No 2 published 06/28/2022
2022. Vol. 13. No 1 published 03/31/2022
2021. Vol. 12. No 4 published 12/27/2021
All Issue:

2022 ( Vol. 13)  |  2   2   1  
2021 ( Vol. 12)  |  4   3   2   1  
2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  4   3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

Social Risks of Small Business in Russia

Юлий Ю Оганисьян, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, main researcher, ,
mailto: politsocio@mail.ru
Social Risks of Small Business in Russia.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2013. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 182-195

This Article is downloaded: 785 times
Topic: Risks of modern Russia

For citation:
Оганисьян Ю. С.. Social Risks of Small Business in Russia. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2013. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 182-195


The article touches upon the issues of small business development in modern Russia. We prove that government support is necessary to overcome the risks that prevent small businesses from becoming the cornerstone of the national economy. Small businesses were the pioneers of the post-Soviet market, but, contrary to the sociologists’ expectations, they failed to become the backbone of the middle class, instead turning into yet another source of social pariahs. Academics, engineers, teachers, and other members of the Soviet intelligentsia were first swept up by the market whirlwind, and then, in their vast majority, left behind below the poverty threshold, turning into outcasts. The reasons behind this apparently lie in the nature and conditions of Russia’s shift to a market economy. Control over the profitable branches of production, finances, and trade soon fell into the hands of gigantic monopolies with close ties to the political elites. Small businesses were left on the very margins of privatization. It is commonly believed that small innovative enterprises contribute more effectively to the development and sales of new products and technologies than big firms. In Russia, however, innovative products account for a barely significant share of small business output. The economic depression and lack of proper small business development may largely be attributed to an unstable macroeconomy, particularly the high level of inflation and budget deficit. Lack of political stability has also had its negative impact. Russia continues to create unfavorable conditions for small business. Oppressing small businesses is easy, as the Russian realia make it far from transparent, and every entrepreneur has skeletons in their closet if you look hard enough. Pushed into a corner, such entrepreneurs often delve into gray areas and start doing business illegally. Small business funding remains to be highly limited, usually not going beyond developing business support programs. But even amid all these hardships, Russian small businesses keep growing. That said, the process is not as successful as it might have been expected if the state and the government had paid enough attention. It is obvious that government support is essential for small enterprises.


market economy, small business, risks, state support, privatization, entrepreneurship

Content 2013' 7