Volume 12 Issue 3 was published. 
The main theme of the issue: Individual and society in the global postmodernity: socio-cultural metamorphoses
  
The articles are published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta Sociologii) in Russian with a special supplement in English.
There are some full-text articles translated into English that originally was published in the journal in Russian.
For full-text articles in English please click here
2021. Vol. 12. No 3 published 09/30/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 2 published 06/30/2021
2021. Vol. 12. No 1 published 04/01/2021
2020. Vol. 11. No 4 published 12/28/2020
All Issue:

2021 ( Vol. 12)  |  3   2   1  
2020 ( Vol. 11)  |  4   3   2   1  
2019 ( Vol. 10)  |  4   3   2   1  
2018 ( Vol.   9)  |  4   3   2   1  
2017 ( Vol.   8)  |  4   3   2   1  
2016 ( Vol.   7)  |  4   3   2   1  
2015 ( Vol.   6)  |  4   3   2   1  
2014 ( Vol.   5)  |  4   3   2   1  
2013 ( Vol.   4)  |  2   1  
2012 ( Vol.   3)  |  2   1  
2011 ( Vol.   2)  |  2   1  
2010 ( Vol.   1)  |  1  

Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (499) 128-85-19
Fax: +7 (495) 719-07-40

e-mail: vestnik@isras.ru

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

web-site: https://www.fctas.org

The Russian budgetary reform in municipal authorities's judgements


I. Shmerlina, Candidate of Philosophy senior researcher, ,
mailto: Shmerlina@yandex.ru
The Russian budgetary reform in municipal authorities's judgements.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2013. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 107-128


This Article is downloaded: 511 times
Topic: Budgetary reform and education

For citation:
I. Shmerlina. The Russian budgetary reform in municipal authorities's judgements. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2013. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 107-128



Abstract

The article is based on opinions about the budget reform (concerning the funding of social institutions), as expressed by the heads of various municipalities during an expert survey. The study touches upon the reform’s concept and model, as well as its possible consequences in today’s Russian realia. The administrative and budget reforms are intended to build a socially efficient and service-oriented state, by providing the people with high-quality education services, healthcare, and social aid, as well as with an intuitive interface for interactions between the government, companies, and individuals. The budget reform is a complex set of transformations in the state-funded sectors of the Russian economy, governed by Federal Law No. 83-FZ, dated May 8, 2010. The intention is to provide the citizens with optimally comfortable, high-quality, and accessible services, while also making these services cost-effective. There has been a lot of public discussion on the extent to which it is possible to balance economic and social benefits. This article touches upon the model of this budget reform, as well as on the risks, consequences, and issues brought about by Federal Law No. 83. The most salient risk, which caused a storm of indignation among the public, arises out of legalizing fee-based services and may have the most unforeseen impact on preschool and school education. There are also some problems with defining the standards for government (municipality) commissioned projects; imposing sanctions for failure to complete a government- or municipality-commissioned project properly and/or in full; and mitigating risks of the law being interpreted incorrectly, or risks of minimizing the scope of free services and making more and more popular services fee-based; and some other matters. In this study, we analyze the prospective consequences of the budget reform, both negative and positive. Experts and the general public warn of such very real dangers as the exacerbation of social inequality, the drop in education and healthcare quality due to the market-oriented overhaul of the respective fields; the degradation of previously accepted social values; etc.

Keywords

budgetary reform, administrative reform, socially effective state, budgetary and autonomous public / municipal institutions


Content 2013' 7