ISSN online: 2221-1616

Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii)

Research Article

Kirill V. Podyachev, Candidate of Political Science leading researcher, , Candidate of political sciences, leading researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
Protest movement in Russia in the first decade of the 21st century: genesis and specifics.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2012. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 145-163

This Article is downloaded: 1544 times
Topic: Political proceses

For citation:
Podyachev K. V. Protest movement in Russia in the first decade of the 21st century: genesis and specifics. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2012. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 145-163


The development of the protest movement in Russia in 2005–11is considered from a perspective of modern political science. The author substantiates the thesis that when analyzing the protest movement, one should proceed not from the number of people participating in the events, but from the frequency and prevalence of actions, and relates that the protest movement in Russia was intense even before the mass protests of December 2011. The task of the work presented in the article was to understand what were the origins of the “new Russian protest”, then to formulate general principles that would adequately interpret it and predict the trends of its further development. The protest movement is seen as a form of civic participation that compensates for the weakness of communication institutions and in this sense is useful to inform authorities about the problems of citizens and to protect the usurped rights. Frequent protest actions denote the existence of certain contradictions in the social system and show active citizens ready to somehow seek the resolution of these contradictions. The analysis of the protest movement suggests that the “awakening of civil society” began much earlier than December 2011. Active citizens participated in this process. Unlike the metropolitan “disaffected”, confined to common slogans, the regional protesters almost always put forward specific demands and demonstrated readiness for dialogue with the authorities. It seems that the main reason for the growth of the protest potential was the unsatisfactory work of legal institutions of communication between the state and society throughout the 2000s. The most active citizens sought to convey their demands to the authorities, force them to dialogue through protest actions. However, the authorities, ignoring them, or creating obstacles in their conduct, evaded the dialogue, forcing activists to join a more active struggle, which is already of a political nature. We can assume that the metropolitan’s “protest for the sake of protest” is likely to decline, and the “protest of demands” that originated much earlier will, on the contrary, become more active.


protest, mass actions, civil society, political communications, civil disobedience


 1. Klement K., Miryasova O., Demidov A. Ot obyvateley k aktivistam. Zarozhdayushchiesya sotsialʹnye dvizheniya v sovremennoy Rossii [From the townsfolk to activists. Emerging social movements in modern Russia]. Moscow, Tri kvadrata, 2010 (in Russ.).

 2. Pod’yachev K. V. Politicheskaya metodologiya v kontekste formirovaniya «umnoy politiki»: k voprosu o teoreticheskikh osnovakh izucheniya vzaimodeystviya obshchestva i vlasti v RF [Political methodology in the context of the formation of "smart politics": to the question of the theoretical foundations for studying the interaction of society and government in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii (ehlektron. nauchn. zhurn.). 2010, no 1. URL: [date of visit: 11.03.2012] (in Russ.).

 3. Aristotelʹ. Politika. Afinskaya politiya [Policy. Athenian polity]. Moscow, Myslʹ, 1997 (in Russ.).

 4. Podʺyachev K. V. Obrashcheniya grazhdan v organy vlasti i grazhdanskoe uchastie v Rossii: vzglyad politologa [Appeals of citizens to government bodies and civic participation in Russia: the view of a political scientist]. Saarbrucken, L.A.P. 2011, pp. 69–78 (in Russ.).

 5. Koehn D. L., Arato E. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i politicheskaya teoriya [Civil society and political theory]. Translate from Eng. Moscow, Vesʹ mir, 2003. P. 506 (in Russ.).

 6. Goncharov D. V. Teoriya politicheskogo uchastiya [Theory of Political Participation]. Moscow, Yuristʹ, 1997. P. 24–25 (in Russ.).

 7. Verkhoturov D. Sotsialʹnyy protest v sovremennoy Rossii. APN (ofitsialʹnyy sayt) [Social protest in modern Russia. APN (official website)]. 11.07.2007. URL: [date of visit: 11.03.2012] (in Russ.).

 8. Ofitsialʹnyy sayt TSK KPRF. Arkhiv [Official website of the Communist Party Central Committee. Archive]. URL: [date of visit: 11.03.2012] (in Russ.).

 9. Predprinimateli protestuyut [Entrepreneurs are protesting]. [date of visit: 11.03.2012] (in Russ.).

 10. Radʹko O. Protesty grazhdan Rossii provotsiruyut chinovniki [Protests of Russian citizens are provoked by officials]. Siti-nʹyus. 12.02.10. URL: [date of visit: 11.03.2012] (in Russ.).