Research ArticleGalina S. Denisova Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia gsdenisova@sfedu.ruORCID ID=0000-0002-3671-9602Lyudmila V. Klimenko Doctor of Sociology, Associate professor, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia lvklimenko@sfedu.ruORCID ID=0000-0001-7696-7830The Russian language in the multi-ethnic regions of Southern Russia in expert narratives: the societal dimension. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2026. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 130-155The research is supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 25-28-00703.Дата поступления статьи: 15.08.2025Topic: Sociology of the Regions of the Russian FederationFor citation: , The Russian language in the multi-ethnic regions of Southern Russia in expert narratives: the societal dimension. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2026. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 130-155DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2026.17.1.7. EDN: BWVLRCТекст статьиAbstractThe relevance of the article’s topic is explained by contemporary geopolitical challenges to the consolidation of Russian multi-ethnic and multi-confessional society, on the one hand, and the insufficiently high symbolic value of the achieved Russian–national bilingualism as a crucial mechanism for this consolidation, on the other. The methodological basis of the study is T. Parsons’ concept of the societal subsystem of society and the constructivist approach to language developed by V. Tishkov. The article is based on the results of analyzing in-depth interviews with representatives of the expert community involved in the implementation and evaluation of language policy in four republics of Southern Russia (Kabardino-Balkaria, Adygea, Dagestan, and Kalmykia). Their populations are characterized by multi-ethnic composition, varying qualitative states of national languages, and simultaneously, the widespread use of the Russian language. It was revealed that all experts recognize the pragmatic functions of the Russian language and, above all, its function as a lingua franca for intercultural communication in a multi-ethnic environment; the dominant role of the Russian language in all spheres of socio-economic life; the prevalence of the Russian language in communication among the youth of all nationalities in the republics under consideration; and the population’s perception of the expansion of the Russian language’s function to a societal scale. Nevertheless, the dominant narrative for the majority of experts is concern about the state of national languages, their narrowed reproduction, and lack of competitiveness in everyday life. At the same time, the role of the Russian language is not reflected upon by most experts in the context of ensuring a unified civilizational space for Russia. The stereotypical perception of the Russian language as a lingua franca obscures the historical result – the achieved binary ethnic identity for the vast majority of the population of Southern Russia. This became possible due to the semantic commonality of the languages of the peoples of Russia, which reflects the commonality of cultures of Russian peoples and manifested itself through the role of the Russian language in the development of national languages. This role can be defined as societal. Without its conscious cultivation, the identificational function of the Russian language narrows and is reduced to constructing the political (civil) aspect of Russian identity, which reproduces the differentiation of an individual’s identity into ethnic as “internal,” “native,” and civic (Russian) as “external.”Keywordslanguage policy, Russian language, national language, societal functions, civilization, multi-ethnic region, South of RussiaReferences Arefyev A. L. The Russian Language at the Turn of the 21st Century. Moscow, Tsentr sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga, 2012: 482 (in Russ.). EDN: QJYFRW. Alpatov V. M. Language Policy in Modern World. Nauchnyj dialog, 2013: 5(17): 8–28 (in Russ.). EDN: QCQEDN. Anderson B. Imaginary communities. Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. Transl. from Eng. by V. Nikolaeva. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole, 2016: 416 (in Russ.). Arutyunova E. M. Russian Language in Russian Identity: Theoretical Approaches and Current Context. Sociologicheskaya nauka i socialnaya praktika, 2021: 9: 1: 111–123 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2021.9.1.7876; EDN: YZKGMB. Astafieva O. N., Kozlovtseva N. A. State policy in the sphere of the Russian language in the context of the Russian world. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2017: 3: 122–139 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2017.3.10; EDN: ZHJOQD. Bart R. Pisat' – neperehodnyi glagol? In Sistema mody: Stat'i po semiotike kultury [Is writing an intransitive verb? In The fashion system: Articles on the semiotics of culture]. Transl. from Fr. S. N. Zenkina Moscow, Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovyh, 2003: 512 (in Russ.). Bauman Z. Myslit sotsiologicheski: uchebnoe posobie [Thinking sociologically]. Transl. from Eng. by A. F. Filippova. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1996: 255 (in Russ.). Bublikov V. V., Varshaver E. A., Stepanov V. V. Deconstructing the Census: Comments and Reflections. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2023: 4: 212–242 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0869541523040097; EDN: HJPWNK Gabdrafikova G. F., Alos-i-Font E. On the Issue of Recording Ethnicity and Language Proficiency in the 2020–2021 All-Russian Population Census. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2024: 1: 28–39 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524010032; EDN: KGNWMK. Gellner E. Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and nationalism]. Transl. from Eng. by Т. V. Berdikova, M. K. Tyunkina; ed. by I. I. Krupnik. Moscow, Progress, 1991: 320 (in Russ.). Girts K. Interpretation of cultures. Transl. from Eng. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2004: 560 (in Russ.). Gorshkov M. K., Tyurina I. O. Consolidation of the Russian society under contemporary challenges: Social-historical and value context. Vestnik RUDN. Sotsiologiya, 2023: 23(4): 720–739 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-4-720-739; EDN: FQZJXO. Denisova G. S., Ulanov V. P. Russkie na Severnom Kavkaze: analiz transformatsii sotsiokulturnogo statusa [Russians in the North Caucasus: analysis of the transformation of sociocultural status]. Rostov-on-Don, RGPU, 2003: 350 (in Russ.). EDN: QPMFFB. Dzhabrailov Yu. D. Identity politics in Russia: ethno-religious and linguistic aspects (on the example of the Republics of the North Caucasus Federal District). Makhachkala, RCEI DFIC RAN, Alef, 2023: 220 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33580/9785002123698; EDN: BVRSIE. Drobizheva L. М., Ryzhova S. V. All-Russian identity in the sociological dimension. Vestnik rossijskoj nacii, 2021: 1-2(77-78): 39–52 (in Russ.). EDN: HAGVQK. Zadorin I. V., Podobed I. V. Russian language in northern Eurasia: political and demographic factors of its distribution and usage. Politiya: Analiz. Hronika. Prognoz (Zhurnal politicheskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki), 2020: 3(98): 136–164 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-98-3-136-164; EDN: CLNNQT. Index of the position of the Russian language in the world: global competitiveness index (GC-Index), sustainability index in the countries of the post-Soviet space (US-Index). Vol. 3. Ed. by Yu. Kamyshevoy. Moscow, GIRYa im. A. S. Pushkina, 2023: 70 (in Russ.). The institutional, historical and cultural framework of the formation of the All-Russian identity in the North Caucasus. Ed. by V. A. Avksentiev, M. M. Shulga. Rostov-on-Don, YUNC RAN, 2022: 224 (in Russ.). EDN: EGFWIA. Kobakhidze E. I., Tuaeva B. V. The Russian language in socio-cultural transformations in the North Caucasus (the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries). Vladikavkaz: SOIGSI VNTs RAN, 2023: 312 (in Russ.). EDN: ACZKDB. Lapin N. I. Sociocultural Approach and Societal-Functional Structures. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2000: 7: 3–12 (in Russ.). EDN: SYRCZN. National policy in Russia: the possibility of implementing foreign experience. Ed. by Yu. G. Volkov. Moscow, SGZ, 2016: 318 (in Russ). EDN: UUXWRI. Pain E. A., Mizhit-Dorzhu V. Sh. The Policy of Preserving Linguistic Diversity in Russia: Declared Goals and Real Practice in the Republics of Southern Siberia. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya, Etnologiya, 2024: 33: 4: 66–93 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2024-33-4-66-93; EDN: ILNQVH. Parsons T. The system of modern societies. Transl. from Eng. by L .A. Sedov, A. D. Kovalev; ed. by M. S. Kovalev. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1998: 270 (in Russ.). Pierce C. S. Selected philosophical works. Transl. from Eng. by K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitriev. Moscow, Logos, 2000: 448 (in Russ.). Saussure Ferdinand de. Kurs obshchei lingvistiki [General Linguistics Course]. Transl. from the Fr. by A. M. Sukhotin. Еd. by R. I. Shor. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004: 256 (in Russ.). Sushchiy S. I. Russians in the Republics of the North Caucasus – frontiers of geodemographic retreat (the first half of the 21st century). Demograficheskoe obozrenie, 2017: 4(3):115–140 (in Russ.). EDN: ZWLDBR. Tishkov V. A. Language Situation and Language Policy in Russia (Revising Categories and Practices). Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2019: 3: 127–144 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.08; EDN: ZHDGFV. Tishkov V. A. On Rewriting Peoples, or Deconstructing Population Censuses. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2023: 4: 183–211 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0869541523040085; EDN: HJKIZH. Trotsuk I. T. Parsons' "Societal Community" in G. Sciortino's Theoretical and Empirical Interpretation. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2024: 23: 204–230 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2024-2-204-230. White L. A. Symbol: The beginning and basis of human behavior. In An anthology of cultural studies. The symbolic field of culture. Trans. from Eng. E. M. Galakhov et. al. St. Petersburg, Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ, 2011: 173–188 (in Russ.). Foucault M. Slova i veshchi: Arheologiya gumanitarnyh nauk [Words and things: The Archaeology of the Humanities]. Transl. from Fr. V. P. Vizgin, N. S. Avtonomova. Moscow, Progress, 1977: 488 (in Russ.). Hobsbawm E. Are All Tongues Equal? Language, culture, and national identity. Logos, 2005: 4(49): 49–59 (in Russ.). EDN: XHKEVT. Yachin S. E. Yazyk kak osnovanie i universalnaya model' kultury [Language as a foundation and universal model of culture]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2010: 1: 14–34 (in Russ.). EDN: MQIXEL. Alexander J. C., Sciortino G. On choosing one’s intellectual predecessors: The reductionism of Camic’s treatment of Parsons and the institutionalists. Sociological Theory, 1996, 14(2): 154–171. DOI: 10.2307/201904. Annamalai E. Managing Multilingualism in India: Political and Linguistic Manifestations. New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, 2001; London, Sage, 2001: 240. Bretton H. Political science, language and politics. In Language and Politics. Ed. by J. O’Barr, W. O’Barr. The Hague: Mouton, 1976: 506. Chandra K. Constructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2012: 500. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199893157.001.0001. Ginsburgh V., Weber S. The Economics of Language. Journal of Economic Literature,2020: 58(2): 348–404. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20191316. Kamwangamalu N. M. Language Policy and Economics: The Language Question in Africa. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016: 232. Languages in a globalising world. Ed. by J. Maurais, M. A. Morris. Cambridge etc., Cambridge univ. press, 2003: 335. Sciortino G. A single societal community with full citizenship for all: Talcott Parsons, citizenship and modern society. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2010: 10(3): 239–259. DOI: 10.1177/1468795X1037171. May S. Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language. Routledge, 2012: 448. Spolsky B. Language Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2004: 250. Woolard K. A. Singular and Plural: Ideologies of Linguistic Authority in 21st Century Catalonia. New York, Oxford University Press, 2016: 365. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190258610.001.0001. Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2026. Vol. 17. No. 1