This article presents the results of a qualitative study conducted among the youth of Primorsky Krai in the spring and summer of 2024. Transcripts of focused interviews with 50 young men and women aged 18–25 were processed using content analysis. To increase the validity of the conclusions, data from mass surveys of youth from recent years were also utilized.
Young people’s attitudes toward the main anti-crisis strategies of the Russian state in the spheres of demographic policy, education, and national security were studied using the examples of: 1) the maternity capital program and preferential mortgage programs for young families; 2) the introduction of traditional spiritual and moral values into school and university education; and 3) the Special Military Operation (SMO) and partial mobilization.
It was found that the youth of Primorsky Krai have fairly general ideas about the maternity capital and preferential mortgage programs for young families, which were assessed rather positively but were also deemed insufficiently effective. Interview participants were mostly critical of the activities of state authorities in the area of family support and birth rate stimulation. In their responses, they expressed dissatisfaction with the economic situation and living conditions in the country, which demotivate Russians from having children.
Young people’s attitudes toward the introduction of traditional spiritual and moral values into the educational process are generally ambiguous. Noteworthy is the fact that those supporting this vector of domestic policy (23 people) were less verbose in justifying their position than those who “support it, but with reservations,” or are negatively disposed. The latter were generous with arguments in defending their opinions.
The perception of the SMO among young people is ambivalent. The vast majority of interview participants recognized it as an important event that affected them to some extent, but less than a third of respondents unequivocally voiced support for the special operation. For some informants, the SMO either was not considered significant from the start or became “routine” over time; one in four negatively assessed Russia’s actions regarding Ukraine. The attitude toward partial mobilization among young people is generally rather negative: 22 people assessed it negatively, while only 3 unequivocally supported it. During the interviews, the phenomenon of the “spiral of silence” was recorded: a significant number of informants (from one-third to one-half) refused to answer questions about the SMO and mobilization.
The obtained results are planned to be used in preparing the second stage of the research, particularly as a basis for formulating hypotheses and closing alternative questions in the survey instrument.

state, anti-crisis strategies, youth, attitudes, demography, traditional values, national security

1. Aparina I. V. Problems and Prospects of Russian Public Administration in the Period of Permanent Crisis. In Society, Economy and Law: Modern Challenges and Development Trends: Elect. Coll. of Art. Volgograd, Sfera, 2023: 18–24 (in Russ.). EDN: SEZFRI.
2. Arutiunian K. S. Changes in Public Consciousness in the Context of Social Crisis (Socio-Philosophical Aspect). Izvestiia vuzov. Povolzhskii region. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2013: 1(25): 73–79 (in Russ.). EDN: QCHHWF.
3. Gorshkov M. K., Tyurina I. O. Consolidation of Russian Society in the Context of Modern Challenges: Historical, Sociological, and Value-Ideological Contexts. Vestnik RUDN. Sotsiologiya,2023: 23(4): 720–739 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-4-720-739; EDN: FQZJXO.
4. Public Administration in Conditions of Crisis and Sanctions: Domestic and Foreign Experience. Еd. by E. V. Okhotsky. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet, 2017: 889 (in Russ.).
5. Zvonovskiy V. B, Khodykin A. V. Russians' Perception of the Conflict with Ukraine: Testing the "Spiral of Silence" Hypothesis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2023: 11: 50–38 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250028531-7. EDN: CAGJIQ.
6. Kazantsev D. A. Escape from Politics: Is There a Future for Youth Political Protest in Siberia and the Far East? Vestnik RUDN. Politologiya, 2022: 24(4): 904–917 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-4-904-917. EDN: LPDPIQ.
7. Katernyi I. V. Development of the Theory of Crisis in Sociology: Evolution of Ideas and Modernity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2023: 10: 14–26 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250028301-4; EDN: HYHUDT.
8. Kreik A. I., Kolomenskaia A. S., Komf E. V. Attitudes and Relationships as a Consequence and Manifestations of Interactions in Society. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya, 2014: 12-11: 2496–2500 (in Russ.). EDN: TJIHYH.
9. Levashov V. K., Novozhenina O. P. Hybrid Socio-Political Reality: Essence, Opinions of Citizens, and Trends. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2022:12: 139–149 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022369-8; EDN: CJXXAJ.
10. Young People on the Future of Russia and on Themselves: Challenges of the Present and Construction of Horizons of the Future (Based on the Materials of the VIII Stage of Monitoring the Dynamics of Sociocultural Development of the Ural Students 1995-2020). Ed. by Yu. R. Vishnevsky. Ekaterinburg, Ural. un-t, 2021: 372 (in Russ.).
11. Nestik T. A. Social Optimism in a Crisis: From Defense Mechanisms to Setting Joint Goals. In Designing the Future. Problems of Digital Reality. Moscow, IPM im. M. V. Keldysha, 2023: 140–145(in Russ.). DOI: 10.20948/future-2023-8; EDN: GQQYYT.
12. Petukhov V. V. Russian youth and its role in the transformation of society. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny, 2020: 3(157): 119–138 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1621; EDN: QWSVAC.
13. Radayev V. V. The split of the millennial generation: historical and empirical substantiation. First part. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2020: 26(3): 30–63 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2020.26.3.7395. EDN: PCGGMH.
14. Rastorguev S. V. Modern studies of the political identity of Russian youth. Gumanitarnye Nauki. Vestnik Finuniversiteta, 2022: 12(4): 89–96 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-4-89-96; EDN: NNZXEY.
15. Russian society and state in the context of global multipolarity. Socio-political situation of Russia in 2022. Ed. by V. K. Levashov. Moscow, FNISC RAN, 2023: 549 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-409-3.2023; EDN: ORTSAQ.
16. Russian Society and State: Foundations of Stability and Trends of Change. Social and Socio-Political Situation. Ed. by V. K. Levashov. Moscow, FNISC RAN, 2024: 432 (in Russ.).
17. Sedova N. N. Dynamics of life-meaning attitudes of Russians and the consolidation potential of society. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny, 2023: 5: 283–304 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2023.5.2498; EDN: PPNIKZ.
18. Siniutin M. V. Dialectics of Crisis and Current Problems of Russia. In The Tenth Kovalev Readings. Ed. by Yu. V. Asochakov. St. Peptersburg, Skifiia‐print, 2015: 614–617 (in Russ.).
19. Shalaev V. V. Society Facing the Challenges of Complexity: On the Path of Anti-Crisis Management. Trudy BGTU, 2018:6(1): 71–76 (in Russ.). EDN: XUTLVB.
20. Yanitskiy O. N. Sociology of critical states of society: theoretical and methodological problems. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsialnaya praktika, 2014: 4(8): 5–24 (in Russ.). EDN: TBWLSX.