ISSN online: 2221-1616

Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii)

Research Article

Ekaterina S. Popova Candidate of Sociology
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
espopova@isras.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0002-9808-3152
Variability of Educational Trajectories in an Intergenerational Context: From Simple to Complex Strategies.
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 187-202

Дата поступления статьи: 02.10.2024
Topic: Problems of Russian Education

For citation:
Variability of Educational Trajectories in an Intergenerational Context: From Simple to Complex Strategies. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 187-202
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2025.16.3.10. EDN: CGOQMN



Abstract

The article presents the results of a sociological analysis of changes in the educational behaviour of various groups of the Russian population. This analysis is significant because education is one of those social domains that are associated with the accumulation and application of human capital. The latter is relevant not only to the stage of modern socioeconomic development but also to the current geopolitical situation. Theoretical and methodological approaches to studying the social behaviour of various population groups in these areas are multidimensional. In this article, the primary focus of research is on educational and professional trajectories and strategies. The author defines these concepts, emphasising the non-synonymous nature of trajectories and strategies.

The objective of the article is to clarify the dynamics of educational trajectories of different generations. The length, content, and variability of educational trajectories in an intergenerational context are being analysed. The empirical basis is formed by the combined RLMS HSE database for individuals from 1994 to 2021, that identifies six generations of Russians according to the classification proposed by V.V. Radaev. An exploratory analysis of the 30th wave of the survey allowed us to identify four generations for further comparative analysis: the "stagnation" generation, the "reform" generation, the millennial generation, and the zoomer generation – 25%, 19.8%, 24.1%, and 24.6% of the total number of respondents in 2021, respectively.

A substantive analysis of the educational and professional trajectories of 16,465 respondents was conducted. A typology of their educational trajectories is proposed: direct, multi-component, shortest, absent, and extended. An increase in the proportion of those choosing multi-component trajectories among representatives of the millennial and zoomer generations is demonstrated. The conditions for implementing the chosen educational and professional strategy are examined, as well as the combination of factors associated with the choice of a direct or multi-component educational trajectory.

It was found that, while the median lengths of educational trajectories for different Russian generations, expressed in years of schooling, are similar, their variability and fullness are not homogeneous. On the one hand, the increasing number of young people among millennials and zoomers choosing multi-component trajectories for vocational education is associated with the development of vocational education. On the other hand, from the perspective of practical recommendations and social management in education and the labour market, it is a priority to note the relative flexibility of the Russian vocational education system, that allows for the reduction of inequality in educational opportunities.

Keywords

sociology, education, educational trajectory, educational strategy, intergenerational differences, human capital, social differentiation

References
  1.  Bessudnov A. R., Kurakin D. Yu. et al. The myth about universal higher education: Russia in the international context. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2017: 3: 83–109 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-3-83-109; EDN: ZHRDRF.
  2. Bessudnov A. R., Malik V. M. Socio-economic and gender inequalities in educational trajectories upon completion of lower secondary education in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2016: 1: 135–167 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-135-167$ EDN: TNQFPW.
  3. Bogdanov M. B., Malik V. M. Social, territorial and gender inequalities in educational trajectories of the Russian youth. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny, 2020: 3: 391–421 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1603; EDN: NBXFVU.
  4. Bourdieu P., Passeron J.-C. Reproduction: Elements of the Theory of Educational System. Transl. from Eng. by N. A. Shmatko. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 2007: 267 (in Russ.).
  5. Gruzdev A. V. Predictive modeling in IBM SPSS Statistics and R: Decision tree method. Moscow, DMK Press, 2016: 278 (in Russ.).
  6. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Returns to Education in Russia: As Low as It Can Get? Working Paper Series WP3/2023/02. Moscow, VSHE, 2021: 78 (in Russ.).
  7. Konstantinovskiy D. L. Inequality and education. Attempt of sociological research on the life starts of the Russian Youth (1960th – beginning of 2000th). Moscow, TsSO, 2008: 552 (in Russ.).
  8. Konstantinovskiy D. L., Popova E. S. From the Perception of Social Changes towards Social Behavior Change. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 2022: 31(1): 6–24 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-1-6-24; EDN: MQXZOT.
  9. Konstantinovskiy D. L., Popova E. S. Education stratification in cities. In Urban development in Russia and China: patterns of modernization. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, Li Peilin et al. Moscow, Novyy Chronograph, 2023: 294–332 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-415-4.2023; EDN: MQXZOT.
  10. Kosyakova Yu., Kurakin D. Yu. et al. Reproduction of social inequality in the Russian educational system. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii, 2016: 5(88): 76–97 (in Russ.).
  11. Radaev V. V. Millennials: How the Russian Society Changes. Moscow, VShE, 2020: 224 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2160-1.
  12. Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001: 1(45): 5–32. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
  13. Coleman J. et al. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington D. C., U. S. Government Printing Office, 1966: 548.
  14. Gregorutti B., Michel B. et al. Correlation and variable importance in random forests. Statistics and Computing, 2017: 3(27): 659–678. DOI: 10.1007/s11222-016-9646-1.
  15. Hindman M. Building Better Models: Prediction, Replication, and Machine Learning in the Social Sciences. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2015: 1(659): 48–62. DOI: 10.1177/0002716215570279.
  16. Montgomery J. M., Hollenbach F. M. et al. Improving Predictions Using Ensemble Bayesian Model Averaging. Political Analysis, 2012: 3(20): 271–291.
  17. Siroky D. S. Navigating Random Forests and related advances in algorithmic modeling. Statistics Surveys, 2009: 3: 147–163. DOI: 10.1214/07-SS033.