Research ArticleNatalia E. Tikhonova Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia; HSE University, Moscow, Russia netichon@rambler.ruORCID ID=0000-0002-5826-4418Anastasia V. Karavay Candidate of Sociology Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia karavayav@yandex.ruORCID ID=0000-0003-3122-4819National Cultural Сode: Moral and Ethical Aspects. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 87-119The article was prepared within the framework of the work under the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 25-18-01067 “Value-based and ideological mobilization of Russian society in the context of increased threats and challenges to the country's sovereignty”.Дата поступления статьи: 25.06.2025Topic: Characteristics of Russia Civilizational DevelopmentFor citation: , National Cultural Сode: Moral and Ethical Aspects. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 87-119DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2025.16.3.6. EDN: YPEACQТекст статьиAbstractThis article attempts to determine whether certain moral norms are part of the Russian cultural code, as well as the specific features of these norms and the extent to which Russians agree on them. To answer these research questions, large-scale AI language models (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.) were used to generate a picture of the diversity of approaches to studying the cultural code of nations in global scholarship and conduct a global bibliometric analysis, the results of which are also presented in the article. Based on these results, an empirical analysis of survey data from 2000, 2015, and 2024 from the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as data from the 7th wave of the World Values Survey (WVS), was conducted. It demonstrated that Russians are characterised by a specific system of moral norms that differ both from those typical of nominal West and those characteristic of the "global majority”, suggesting that a number of these norms can be considered a separate element of the national cultural code. According to the study, these include: a persistently negative attitude toward homosexual relations and related lifestyle aspects (same-sex marriage, etc.) while allowing for a relatively high degree of freedom in heterosexual relations; a categorical rejection of treason, which is complemented by the prevalence of norms that ensure peace in a multiethnic and multi-religious country; and a denial of the permissibility of enrichment at the expense of others. A widespread as compared to other countries moral relativism regarding the fulfillment of one's obligations to the state (paying taxes, etc.) was also revealed, although at the normative level, the majority of Russians still recognise the inadmissibility of evading these obligations. Dynamic analysis demonstrated the consistent, widespread prevalence of these norms, while cluster analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity of Russians´ perceptions of moral norms and confirmed that some of them are stable enough to be included in the nation's cultural code. It can also be considered proven that the category of cultural code itself can be applied in sociological research.Keywordscultural code, cultural identity, mentality, normative value systems, cross-cultural comparisons, moral norms, moral relativism, traditional values, Russian civilization, social normsReferences Avanesova G. A., Kuptsova I. A. Cultural code. In Applied Cultural Studies. Encyclopedia. Comp. and ed. by I. M. Bykhovskaya. Moscow, Soglasie, 2019: 270–273 (in Russ.). EDN: WMGERK. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opy`ta [Russia: Critique of historical experience: in 3 vols]. Moscow, Filos. obshc-vo SSSR, 1991: 470 (in Russ.). EDN: QOPRVV. Gotovo li rossijskoe obshhestvo k modernizacii? [Is Russian society ready for modernization?]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, R. Krumma, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2010: 344 (in Russ.). EDN: OFXFBB. Erasov B. S. Civilizacii: universalii i samoby`tnost [Civilizations: universals and originality]. Moscow, Nauka, 2002: 524 (in Russ.). Zubok Yu. A., Chuprov V. I. Self-regulation of life-meaning values in the cultural space of youth. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2019: 10(4): 164–186 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.614; EDN: SBTVHF. Zykin A. V. Formation of the cultural code of the Altai ethnic groups. Kultura i tsivilizatsiya, 2018: 8(6A): 79–92 (in Russ.). EDN: ZAGMNV. Ivanova A. P., Yagodkina M. V. Cultural codes in modern advertising. Uchenye zapiski NovGU, 2018: 8(33): 5 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34680/2411-7951.2020.8(33).5; EDN: YUFHOM. Izmenyayushhayasya Rossiya v zerkale sociologii [Changing Russia in the mirror of sociology]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, Letnii sad, 2004: 280 (in Russ.). EDN: QOCSCR. Izotova N. N. Cultural code: semiotic aspect. Kultura i tsivilizatsiya, 2020: 10(1): 122–127 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.47.1.016; EDN: WWKBKX. Kasyanova K. O russkom nacional`nom haraktere [On the Russian national character]. Moscow, INME, 1994: 367 (in Russ.). Krichevskii N. A. Russian deep bonds: the cultural code of national character. 2nd ed. Moscow, Dashkov i K, 2022 (in Russ.). EDN: VKDEUV. Latova N. V. Cultural specificity of Russians (ethnometric analysis based on G. Hofstede’s concept). Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2016: 7(4): 155–179 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2016.19.4.433: EDN: XWETNN. Lapin N. I. Puti Rossii: sociokulturnye transformacii [Paths of Russia: sociocultural transformations]. Moscow, IF RAN, 2000: 191 (in Russ.). EDN: SGUGQD. Losev D. V. Cultural code: definition of the concept and practical problems of the phenomenon: theoretical review. NovGU im. Yaroslava Mudrogo, 2024: 4(2): 132–140 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30853/pa20240020; EDN: MTVFPD. Lotman Yu. M. The semiosphere. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb, 2010: 703 (in Russ.). EDN: QWYFLB. Magun V. S. Evolution of basic values of the Russian population, 2006–2021. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2023: 12: 44–58 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029336-2; EDN: RIAJNU. Merkulova N. G. Mentality – cultural code – language of culture: on the correlation of concepts. Regionologiya, 2015: 2(91): 188–196 (in Russ.). EDN: UCMEVP. Youth and Russia of the future. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, M. E. Fradkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, RISI; Ves’ Mir, 2023: 394 (in Russ.). EDN: OAGDSK. Nikulkina O. G. Key words of Russian language culture. Global’nyi nauchnyi potentsial, 2025: 1(166): 178–181 (in Russ.). EDN: ZEUTKI. Ovsyannikov V. P. Russian sociocultural type: myth or reality. Zapad-Rossiya-Vostok, 2014: 8: 81–88 (in Russ.). EDN: TFXUGV. Russian society and the challenges of the times. Book 2. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, V. V. Petukhov. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2015: 432 (in Russ.). EDN: VNKUTL. Russian society and the challenges of the times. Book 8. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2025: 352 (in Russ.). Rybina M. N. Moral and ethical context of Russian socio-economic thought. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 2024: 4: 144–150 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2024.4.17; EDN: BFYZTM. Savitskii V. M. Ethnospecificity of cultural codes. Etnicheskaya kultura, 2020: 3(4): 40–44 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31483/r-86172; EDN: SFGHIA. Tikhonova N. E. Dinamika normativno-cennostnoj sistemy rossijskogo obshhestva (1995–2010) [Dynamics of the normative-value system of Russian society (1995–2010)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2011: 4: 5–19 (in Russ.). EDN: NXPUCV. Tikhonova N. E. Sociocultural modernization in Russia (experience of empirical analysis). Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2008: 3: 5–20 (in Russ.). EDN: IPVFXH. Tikhonova N. E. Specifics of the worldview of supporters of the western path of development for Russia in mass strata. Universe of Russia. Sociologiya. Etnologiya, 2023: 32(4): 6–35 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2023-32-4-6-35; EDN: NQSIBT. Tikhonova N. E. Ideological segmentation of the mass strata of the population in the context of escalating confrontation with the West (an empirical analysis). POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2024: 5: 136–153 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.05.09; EDN: ICDAIE. Shevchenko V. N. Ontological constants of Russia as a civilization-state in the context of world history. Filosofskie nauki, 2019: 62(1): 29–47 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-1-29-47; EDN: TVQKCE. Shkaratan O. I. Formation of post-Soviet neoetacracy. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2009: 1: 5–22 (in Russ.). EDN: JXENXH. Shpyneva E. M., Golubchikova M. G. Experience in studying the features of the cultural code of representatives of Russian regions (on the example of the Irkutsk region). Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2024: 1(104): 419–422 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/1991-5497-2024-1104-419-422; EDN: YXQDEA. Yakovenko I. G. Cognition of Russia: a civilizational analysis. 3rd ed., revised. Moscow, Znanie, 2017: 642 (in Russ.). EDN: ZMHOKV. Abbasi A. M., Khan M. A. et al. Ethnobotanical appraisal and cultural values of medicinally important wild edible vegetables of Lesser Himalayas-Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2013: 9: 1–13. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-66. Alexander J. C. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford University Press, 2003: 296. Chiu C. Y., Gries P. et al. Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 2011: 67(4): 663–676. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01721.x. Cole W. M. Sovereignty relinquished? Explaining commitment to the international human rights covenants, 1966–1999. American Sociological Review, 2005: 70(3): 472–495. DOI: 10.1177/000312240507000306. Fatehi K., Priestley J. L., Taasoobshirazi G. The expanded view of individualism and collectivism: One, two, or four dimensions? International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 2020: 20(1): 7–24. DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600007116. Giesen B., Eisenstadt S. N. The construction of collective identity. European Journal of Sociology, 1995: 36: 72–102. DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600007006. Guthman J. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum, 2008: 39(3): 1171–1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.002. Haerpfer C., Inglehart R. et al. (eds) World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0. Madrid, Spain; Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat, 2022. DOI: 10.14281/18241.24. Haidt J. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Vintage Books, 2012: 419. Hofstede G., Minkov M., Hofstede G. J. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. Mc Graw-Hill, 2010: 561. Inglehart R., Baker W. E. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 2000: 65(1): 19–51. DOI: 10.2307/2657288. Jackson J. C., Medvedev D. Worldwide divergence of values. Nature Communications, 2024: 15(1): 2650. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46581-5. Lebedeva N., van de Vijver F., Galyapina V. N. Multiple social identities in the post-Soviet context. In Adams B., van de Vijver F. (eds) Non-Western Identity: Research and Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer, 2021: 131–150. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77242-0_8. Renn O., Burns W. J. et al. The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 1992: 48(4): 137–160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x. Shilling C. Culture, the ‘sick role’ and the consumption of health. British Journal of Sociology, 2002: 53(4): 621–638. DOI: 10.1080/0007131022000021515. Schwartz S. A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 2006: 5(2–3): 137–182. DOI: 10.1163/156913306778667357. Taylor J. R., Lovell S. T. Urban home gardens in the Global North: A mixed methods study of ethnic and migrant home gardens in Chicago, IL. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2015: 30(1): 22–32. DOI: 10.1017/S1742170514000180. Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3