The Basic Income Paradigm and Its Impact on Human Development Opportunities

The actualisation of research interest in the issue of basic income is driven by growing inequalities in various aspects of people's lives and the unfair distribution of material and social goods in capitalist states. Providing a basic income opens up opportunities to enhance social guarantees and the standard of living for citizens.

The article examines the ideological paradigms of the social consequences of implementing basic income. It is shown that in capitalist states, this payment, judging by numerous experiments, is being implemented in transitional forms. Its introduction serves as one of the adaptive mechanisms for capital to adapt to the modern conditions of profit extraction. The antagonistic interests of ruling classes and the majority of citizens, as well as the fragmentation of the private interests of the latter, do not allow the widespread implementation of basic income in full accordance with its fundamental criteria. The main criteria include universality – payment to all citizens, unconditionality – payment regardless of employment and other characteristics of the economic and social status of individuals, and regularity – payment throughout the entire lives of basic income recipients.

The possibility of adhering to the fundamental criteria for providing basic income is justified in the implementation of a socialist paradigm for the development of modern states. It is demonstrated that in contemporary Russia, an evolutionary resolution of accumulated contradictions and a phased implementation of a new socialist development paradigm are possible. This could potentially be a chain of humanitarian transformations, conditioned by the circumstances that have emerged. The beginning of this transformation has already been initiated after February 2022 with the expansion of state ownership in key economic sectors, the introduction of state planning within them, the demand for new personnel prioritising collective and state values to address these issues. All this does not contradict the development of market sectors of the economy, oriented toward individual citizens' needs and the development of their diverse personal potential, as well as servicing state ownership in key sectors and facilitating comprehensive international economic connections.

Sociological research conducted under the author's guidance has shown that potential recipients of basic income in Russia confirm their intentions to develop their human potential and consider it advisable to conduct experiments on the provision of basic income.

In conclusion, it is concluded that the introduction of basic income, in conjunction with other instruments of socialist evolution of Russian society and the state, represents an opportunity for the development and realisation of human potential in our country.

basic income, universality, unconditionality, regularity of payment, capitalism, socialism, contradictions, human potential

1. Alternative: Choosing a path (management restructuring and market horizons). Moscow, Mysl, 1990: 461 (in Russ.).
2. Andreenkova A. V. Comparative analysis of the attitude of the population to the idea of an unconditional basic income in Russia and in Europe. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 1: 18–30 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008321-6; EDN: FFFAHV.
3. Biyzhanova E. К. Universal Basic Income as a Tool to Combat Inequality in Modern Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2023: 7: 154–158 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250026594-6; EDN: AVSXQY.
4. Bobkov V. N., Akimov A. K. Theory of social quality as an innovative tool for studying society (reflections in connection with the international sociological forum: “Social quality and social management”). Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2018: 4 (210): 115−120 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1999-9836-2018-10047; EDN: YROBQL.
5. Bobkov V. N., Gulyugina A. A., Odintsova E. V. Methodological approaches to strengthening the targeting of social support for low-income families with children. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2019: 1 (211): 9–19 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1999-9836-2019-10049; EDN: LBIWLB.
6. Bobkov V. N., Gulyugina A. A., Odintsova E. V. Social consequences of thirty years of capitalist reforms in Russia. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2022: 1: 78–107 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2022-1-78-107; EDN: YGFLOH.
7. Bobkov V. N., Odintsova E. V. Universal basic income: a chance for Russia? Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2023: 19: 1: 141–143 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_12_141_143; EDN: XYPSVS.
8. Bobkov V. N., Chernykh E. A., Zolotov S. A., Pavlova V. V. Unconditional basic income: criterial foundations, transitional forms and experience of implementation experiments. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 10: 84–94 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009313-7.
9. Bobkov V. N. The depressing social results of the twenty-year capitalist transformation of Russia. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2012: 2: 10–28 (in Russ.).
10. Bobkov V. N., Bobkov N. V., Shunyaev A. V. Guaranteed minimum income for low-income families with children as a form of universal basic income. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitiye, 2023: 1: 49–53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.53115/19975996_2023_01_049-053; EDN: XQDPLP.
11. Buzgalin A. V. Renaissance of socialism. Moscow, URSS, 2007: 512 (in Russ.).
12. Gorshkov M. K. Social justice in the mass perception and value orientations of Russians. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii, 2022: 11: 6 (58): 32–47 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2022.6.1; EDN: BZZAGS.
13. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Universal basic income: does it have a future? Moscow, NIU VSHE, 2020: 52 (in Russ.).
14. Kvashnin Yu. D. Basic income for European countries: from theory to practice. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2019: 3: 171‒181 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope32019171181; EDN: AHPRFR.
15. Kvashnin Yu. D. Foreign experiments with an unconditional basic income: approaches, results, interpretations, lessons for Russia. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2021: 17: 3: 314–326 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.3.2; EDN: OUDXPO.
16. Kolganov A. I. Chto takoe socializm? Marksistskaya versiya [What is socialism? Marxist version]. Moscow, LIBROKOM, 2012: 401 (in Russ.).
17. Kulikov A. G. Unconditional "basic" income in Russia: a chance or a trap? Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN, 2022: 2: 192–205 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2022_2_192_205; EDN: YBRHTJ.
18. Bobkov V. N., Odintsova E. V., Podvoisky G. L. Sustainable and precarious employment in the Russian Federation. Mir novoj ekonomiki, 2023:17:3: 109–124 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-3-109-124; EDN: JEL J21.
19. Odintsova E. V. Employees of organizations: qualitative and quantitative identification based on manifestations of precarious employment. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2022: 19: 3: 385–394 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_3_5_385_394; EDN: LHJVOO.
20. From precarious employment to the precarization of life. Ed. by Zh. T. Toshchenko. Moscow, Ves Mir, 2022: 364 (in Russ.).
21. Russian society and the challenges of the time. Book 5. Ed.by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, Ves Mir, 2017: 427 (in Russ.).
22. Subetto A. I. Noospheric scientific school in Russia: results and prospects. Scientif. ed. by L. A. Zelenov. St. Petersburg, Asterion, 2021:76 (in Russ.). EDN: QONWVN.
23. Subetto A. I. Philosophy of economy in the emerging new, noospheric paradigm of the relationship between Man and Nature in the 21st century (about the "philosophical and economic revolution" in the system of philosophical knowledge). Accessed 07.04.2023. URL: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0016/001h/00165356.htm (in Russ.).
24. Universal basic income: a chance for Russia? Ed. by V. N. Bobkov (editor-in-chief), E. V. Odintsova. Moscow, REU im. G. V. Plekhanov; Izhevsk: Shelest, 2022: 360 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/978-5-6048876-5-3-2022; EDN: PDLTFU.
25. The level and quality of life of the population of Russia: from reality to the design of the future. Ed. by V. N. Bobkov, N. V. Loktyukhina, E. F. Shamaeva. Moscow, FNISTs RAN, 2022: 274 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-388-1.2022; EDN: WOQAYF.
26. BIEN. “About Basic Income. 2018. Accessed 01.07.2023. URL: https://basicincome.org/basic-income.
27. Friedman M. “The Case for the Negative Income Tax. National Review, 1967: 7 (March): 239‒241.
28. Gentilini U., Grosh M., Rigolini I., Yemtsov R. Exploring Universal Basic Income: A Guide to Navigating Concepts, Evidence, and Practices. Washington, D.C., World Bank Group, 2019: 300.
29. Lehto O. Basic Income around the World: The Unexpected Benefits of Unconditional Cash Transfers. UK, Adam Smith Research Trust 2018: 36 p. Accessed 01.07.2023. URL: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56eddde762cd9413e151ac92/t/5a5f54ff53450ae87509190a/151619712 0863/Universal+Basic+Income.pdf.
30. Manjarin E., Szlinder M. A Marxist Argumentative Scheme on Basic Income and Wage Share in an Anti-capitalist Agenda. In Haagh A., Howard M. (ed.) Basic Income Studies. De Gruyter, 2016: 11: 1: 49‒59.
31. Melzochová J., Špecián P. An Estimate of the Basic Income Costs: Case of the Czech Republic An Estimate of the Basic Income Costs: Case of the Czech Republic. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015: 30: 550‒557. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01267-8.
32. Paine T. Agrarian Justice. Devon, UK, Earthsharing Devon, 2017: 18‒31.
33. van Parijs P. “Basic Income: A simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. In Ackerman B., Alstott A., van Parijs P. (eds) Redesigning Distribution: Basic Income and Stakeholder Grants as Cornerstones for an Egalitarian Capitalism (Real Utopias Project). London, UK, Verso, 2006: 20‒21.
34. van Parijs P., Vanderborght Y. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2017: 400.
35. Russel B. Roads to Freedom: Socialism, Anarchism, and Syndicalism, Allen & Unwin. London, UK, 1918: 118‒119.
36. Ståhl C., MacEachen E. Universal Basic Income as a Policy Response to COVID-19 and Precarious Employment: Potential Impacts on Rehabilitation and Return-to-Work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2020: 31: 3‒6. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09923-w.
37. Standing G. Battling Eight Giants: Basic Income Now. London: I.B. Tauris, 2020: 152.
38. Tobin J., Pechman J., Mieszkowski P. Is a Negative Income Tax Practical? Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., USA, 1967: 27.
39. Zwolinski M. The Pragmatic Libertarian Case for a Basic Income Guarantee. Cato Unbound: A Journal of Debate, 2014. Accessed 01.07.2023. URL: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2014/08/04/matt-zwolinski/pragmatic-libertarian-case-basic-income-guarantee