Women's Entrepreneurship in the Republic of Tuva: Motives, Barriers and Opportunities

The article analyzes the gender characteristics of economic and entrepreneurial activity among the population of Tuva.

The transformation of the structure of the regional economy and the labor market in the post-Soviet period consisted in a significant reduction in the primary and secondary sectors due to the destruction of the agricultural and industrial complexes of Tuva, in which mainly men had been employed. During the socio-economic crisis of the 1990s, excessively feminized branches of the tertiary sector, such as education, healthcare, and social assistance, saved jobs. In addition, the higher level of education of women in the republic compared to men increased their adaptive capabilities in a crisis. For these reasons, a steady and long-lasting trend has begun in Tuva since the 1990s, in which women demonstrate greater economic activity compared to men, which does not coincide with global and Russian trends. The gender gap in favor of women in employment emerged also due to the general modernization processes in Tuvan society in the XX century, which resulted in the shaping of a new gender order and a new type of family with double income and two breadwinners.

The analysis of women's economic activity in general and entrepreneurship at the present stage has shown that women play a key role in the formation of a social group of entrepreneurs and owners of small and medium-sized businesses. A regional feature is that the share of entrepreneurship as a social community still remains insignificant in the social structure of Tuvan society. The fact that in the gender composition of individual entrepreneurs of Tuva, women slightly, but still quantitatively exceed the number of men, demonstrates the leveling of socio-cultural stereotypes associated with the historically established distribution of gender roles. The peculiarities of gender differentiation in economic activities are that women are represented in many areas that have traditionally been considered "male", that the gender-marked areas are practically absent. According to the opinion of women-entrepreneurs, there are no institutional, formal barriers to women's entrepreneurship in Tuva. At the same time, the general problems of poverty of the population remain relevant, causing difficulties in starting financial opportunities for the majority of the population, barriers of a socio-psychological nature.

economic activity, employment, unemployment, self-employment, women's entrepreneurship, motivation and barriers

1. Akimova O. E. Motivational foundations of entrepreneurial activity in Russia. Problemnyj analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie, 2013: 1: 131–138 (in Russ.).
2. Ananchenkova P. I. STEAM – freelancing: new opportunities for self-Employment of women. Gendernoe izmerenie cifrovoj jekonomiki: ot strategii k dejstviju (2018–2030): mat. Vseros. konf. s mezhd. uchastiem, April 20-21, 2018 [The Gender Dimension of the Digital Economy: from Strategy to Action (2018-2030)]. IvSU. Ivanovo, IvGU, 2018: 131–134 (in Russ.).
3. Babaeva L. V., Chirikova A. E. Zhenshhina v biznese [A Woman in Business]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1996: 3: 75–80 (In Russ.).
4. Barsukova S. Ju. Zhenskoe predprinimatel`stvo: specifika i perspektivy [Women's entrepreneurship: specifics and prospects]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1999: 9: 75–84 (in Russ.).
5. Besschetnova O. V., Krekova M. M., Arzamasova E. L. Women's entrepreneurship in Russia: pro et contra. Jekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo, 2020: 10: 12: 3059–3074 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/epp.10.12.111499
6. Voronkova A. I. Meta description of women's business engagement scenarios. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2019: 10: 4: 231–248 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.618
7. Galljamov R. R. Features of women's entrepreneurship in modern Russia. Jekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal, 2016: 3 (131): 56–67 (in Russ.).
8. Golenkova Z. T., Goliusova Ju. V. New social groups in modern stratification systems of global society. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika, 2013: 3 (03): 5–15 (in Russ.).
9. Gorshkov M. K. On the social results of post-soviet transformations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2019: 11: 3–17 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007445-2
10. Zdravomyslova E. A., Temkina A. A. 12 lekcij po gendernoj sociologii: uchebnoe posobie [12 Lectures on gender sociology: a textbook]. St. Petersburg, EU v SPb., 2015: 768 (in Russ.).
11. Zdravomyslova O. M. Gendernye aspekty sovremennyh rossijskih transformacij: problemy metodologii issledovanija [Gender aspects of modern Russian transformations: problems of research methodology]: Abstract of Diss. ...Dr. Philos. Sciences. Moscow, 2008: 50 (in Russ.).
12. Ilimbetova A. A. Alternative sources of data on the level of employment of Russian women in entrepreneurship. Narodonaselenie, 2019: 4: 4: 90–102 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00041
13. Kolobova A. E. Women entrepreneurs of middle and older age: strokes to the portrait. Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve, 2016: 1 (78): 51–59 (in Russ.).
14. Korobova O. O. Digital economy: prospects for creating new models of women's entrepreneurship. Gendernoe izmerenie cifrovoj jekonomiki: ot strategii k dejstviju (2018–2030): mat. Vseros. konf. s mezhd. uchastiem, April 20-21, 2018 [The Gender Dimension of the Digital Economy: from Strategy to Action (2018-2030)]. IvSU. Ivanovo, IvGU, 2018: 64–68 (in Russ.).
15. Kosjakova Ju., Kurakin D. Do institutions matter? Professional gender segregation at the stage of entering the labor market in soviet and post-soviet Russia. Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, 2016: 19: 9 (88): 127–145 (in Russ.).
16. Natsak O. D. Gender and demographic features of the labor market of the Republic of Tuva: trends and prospects. Narodonaselenie, 2021: 24: 2: 120–130 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/population.2021.24.2.11
17. Pin'koveckaja Ju. S. Zhenskoe predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah [Women's entrepreneurship in Russia and foreign countries]. Ulyanovsk, UlGU, 2020: 169 (in Russ.).
18. Radaev V. V. Once again about the subject of economic sociology. Jekonomicheskaja sociologija, 2002: 3:3: 21–34 (in Russ.).
19. Semenova Ju. A. Women's entrepreneurship in modern russian society: features and prospects. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser.: Sociologija. Politologija, 2014: 14: 2: 17–19 (in Russ.).
20. Sillaste G. G. Sociogendernye otnosheniya v period social`noj transformacii Rossii [Sociogender relations in the period of social transformation of Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1994: 3: 15–22 (in Russ.).
21. Soboleva I. V. Features of women's employment in the light of global trends in promoting gender equality. Jekonomika i biznes: teorija i praktika, 2019: 3–2: 108–112 (in Russ.). DOI 10.24411/2411-0450-2019-10448
22. Socio-stratification processes in the Republic of Tyva/ Ed. by Golenkova Z. T., Sushko P. E., Goliusova Ju. V. Moscow-Kyzyl, FNISTS RAN, 2020: 128 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250013770-0
23. Utkina N. Ju. Objective and subjective factors of the development of women's entrepreneurship in Russia. Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve, 2015: 1 (82): 17–82 (in Russ.).
24. Hotkina Z. A., Dobrohleb V. G., Rusanova N. E. Gender problems in Russia and the methodology of their analysis. Narodonaselenie, 2018: 21: 4: 135–149 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-4-12
25. Chirikova A. E. Women's entrepreneurship in Russia: conceptual approaches and research directions. Gender i jekonomika: mirovoj opyt i jekspertiza rossijskoj praktiki [Gender and economics: world experience and expertise of Russian practice]. Moscow, Russkaja panorama, 2002: 235–249 (in Russ.).
26. Shtroo V. A., Kol'cova E. A. Work - life balance, or is there life after work? Psihologija v jekonomike i upravlenii, 2012: 2: 30–37 (in Russ.).
27. Alkhaleed S. Women’s entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: feminist solidarity and political activism in disguise? Gender, Work and Organization, 2021: 28: 950–972. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12626
28. Bayat A. Life as politics: how ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford University Press, 2013: 392.
29. Emslie C. and Hunt K. ‘Live to work’ or ‘work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work-life balance among men and women in mid-life. Gender, Work and Organization, 2009: 16: 1: 151–172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00434.x