Families of migrants from post-Soviet states: between homeland and Russia

The article is based on sociological surveys conducted in spring 2017 and autumn 2020. It examines the intra-family relations of migrants who came to Russia from the post-Soviet countries (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Ukraine). Particular attention is paid to the study of the life of migrants and their relatives, who, as a result of various life circumstances, found themselves separated by state borders. Migration models of the foreigners moving to Russia with their families, including minor children, are considered as well.

Based on the obtained data, it was revealed that transnational communication is retained to a greater extent by foreigners who initially do not plan to change their place of residence and permanently reside in Russia. This group of migrants is more involved in the life of the extended family in the country of origin. Among all groups of migrants, visitors from the countries of Central Asia stand out. They are the ones who most often come to Russia alone, while actively building social interaction with the family left at home (they regularly communicate via mobile, and send money back home or bring it themselves). Their purpose is to earn money for a higher standard of living in their country of origin. Whereas visitors who intend to stay in Russia permanently, more often live together with their close relatives and maintain less transnational contacts. However, it should be taken into account that migrants' plans for living in Russia may change depending on life situations, changing in turn the nature of transnational interaction.

Migration to Russia with minor children is considered as a separate subject, since in these conditions, migrant parents and their children are forced to face certain difficulties (for example, the inclusion of children in the Russian education system, mastering the Russian language by children, etc.), that require significant material, physical and emotional costs.

migrant, family and single migration, post-Soviet countries, transnationalism

1.  Abashin S. N. Central Asian Migration: Practices, Local Communities, Transnationalism. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2012: 4: 3–13 (in Russ.).
2. Ajtieva M. Money transfers, unrealistic expectations and conflicting responsibilities towards family. In Brednikova O., Abashin S. N. (eds) “Living in two worlds”: rethinking transnationalism and translocality. Coll. of art. Moscow, NLO, 2021: 106–146 (in Russ.).
3. Akifyeva R. N. Children and Their Migrant Parents in St. Petersburg: Divergent Lines of Behavior. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2015: 5: 117–134 (in Russ.).
4. Brednikova O. “I live constantly looking back. In Brednikova O., Abashin S. N. (eds) “Living in two worlds”: rethinking transnationalism and translocality. Coll. of art. Moscow, NLO, 2021: 71–103 (in Russ.).
5. Brednikova O., Sabirova G. Children in Migrant Families: Parenting Strategies in Transnational Contexts. Antropologicheskij forum, 2015: 26: 127–152 (in Russ.).
6. Brednikova O., Abashin S. N. (eds) “Living in two worlds”: rethinking transnationalism and translocality. Coll. of art. Moscow, NLO, 2021: 520 (in Russ.).
7. Kasymova S. Transborder communication or mobile communication in everyday life of families of Tajik labor migrants. In Brednikova O., Abashin S. N. (eds) “Living in two worlds”: rethinking transnationalism and translocality. Coll. of art. Moscow, NLO, 2021: 482–515 (in Russ.).
8. Mkrtchyan N. V., Florinskaya Y. F. Migration: main trends in January-February 2021. Monitoring jekonomicheskoj situacii v Rossii: tendencii i vyzovy social'no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija, 2021: 10 (142): June: 16–19 (in Russ.).
9. Rivs M. Life in migration: pursuit of “honestly earned money” in the epoch of social inequality. Per. Daur A. In Brednikova O., Abashin S. N. (eds) “Living in two worlds”: rethinking transnationalism and translocality. Coll. of art. Moscow, NLO, 2021: 44–70 (in Russ.).
10. Florinskaya Y. F., Mkrtchyan N. V. Migration to Russia: the Lowest Rate in a Decade. Jekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, 2021: 1: 28: 50–54 (in Russ.).
11. Florinskaya Y. F. Migration of families with children to Russia: problems of integration (based on sociological surveys of the Center for Migration Research). Problemy prognozirovanija, 2012: 4: 118–126 (in Russ.).
12. Bryceson D., Vuorela U. Transnational families in the twentieth century. In Bryceson D., Vuorela U. (eds) The Transnational Family: New European Frontiers and Global Networks. Oxford, Berg, 2002. Accessed 25.03.2022. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269990597_Transnational_Families_in_the_21_st_Century
13. Glick Schiller N. G., Basch L., Blanc-Szanton C. Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration. In Glick Schiller N. G., Basch L., Blanc-Szanton C. (eds) Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered. New York, New York Academy of Sciences, 1992: 1–24.
14. Kofman E. Family-related migration: a critial review of European Studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2004: 30: 243–262. DOI: 10.1080/1369183042000200687
15. Moskal M. Transnationalism and the role of family and children in intra-European labour migration. European Societies, 2011: 13: 29–50. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2010.497225
16. Pries L. Transnationalisierung der sozialen Welt? Berliner Journal Für Soziologie, 2002: 12: 263–272. DOI: 10.1007/BF03204056