Professional communities of young scientists in the face of the uncertainty of the modern world. Case of Russian research centers (according to a qualitative study)

The article discusses the key characteristics of the integration of young scientists into scientific communities in the context of "fluid" modernity. The authors consider the professional communities of young scientists as mobile networks in the society of plasma, fluid modernity, that are endowed with both autonomy and a constant mechanism for adapting to new realities, processes and transformations that exist in modern societies. Fluid modernity in the professional sphere is understood by the authors as a time of opportunity, including opportunities for young scientists to take initiatives, as well as a world of total uncertainty, where swiftness and changeability, constant search and change of various strategies become prerequisites for successful career building and career growth. The empirical basis of the analysis is the result of a qualitative study conducted with the participation of the authors. In the course of the study, 30 biographical interviews with young scientists in a city of regional significance, a young science city, and a large city of federal significance were recorded and analysed. The authors put forward a hypothesis about the importance of horizontal integration of young scientists into scientific communities. The role of the city as an actor that forms scientific communities and strategies for the interaction and integration of young scientists with scientific communities is also assessed. Particular attention is paid to the meaning of a scientific career and the individual role of scientific communities in the career of young scientists, as well as strategies for their integration into the scientific environment. As new opportunities that arise for scientists in the world of fluid modernity, there are considered changes in the configuration of strategies for both building a scientific career and integrating into scientific communities at the local, all-Russian and global levels. The authors conclude that both the city itself, its conditions and the orientation of the local scientific community, that is determined by the presence of specialised disciplines, influence the integration and construction of strategies for advancement in a scientific career. According to the authors, a successful strategy that allows using the potential of the world of fluid modernity is the horizontal integration of young scientists, that gives them the opportunity to maximise their resources.

sociology, science, young scientists, scientific communities, biographical trajectories, fluid modernity, building a career in the scientific field, uncertainty

1. Abramov R. N. Sociology of Professions and Occupations in Russia: A Review of the Current Situation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2013: 1: 99–108 (in Russ.).
2. Bocharov T. Advocates’ Profession as a Community of Practice. Sotsiologia vlasti, 2016: 28(3): 80–114 (in Russ.).
3. Volkov V., Dmitrieva A., Pozdnyakov M., Titaev K., Volkov V. Rossijskie sud'i: sociologicheskoe issledovanie professii [Russian Judges: a Sociological Study of the Profession]. Мoscow, Norma, 2015: 272 (in Russ.).
4. Giddens E. Ustroenie obshchestva. Ocherk teorii strukturacii [The organization of society. An essay on the theory of structuration]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt, 2005: 528 (in Russ.).
5. Ignatenkova G. Bio-power and plasma: how covid made an actor-network theorist stop being afraid and fall in love with Foucault. Filosofsko-literaturnyj zhurnal «Logos», 2021: 31 (4): 141 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2021-2-105-123
6. Nikolaev V. G. Sociologiya zanyatij i professij Everetta H'yuza: Zabytyj intellektual'nyj resurs [Everett Hughes’ Sociology of Occupations and Professions: an Outstanding Intellectual Resource]. Antropologiya professij: Granitsy zanyatosti v epokhu nestabil’nosti [Antropologiya professij: granicy zanyatosti v epohu nestabil'nosti]. Ed. by Romanov P. V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. R. Moscow, Variant, CSPGI, 2012: 59–74 (in Russ.).
7. Saburova L. A. Regional academic community under reforms: basic transformations and perceptions. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: economicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 2018: 4(146): 211–228 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.11
8. Sokolov M. M. Studying local academic communities. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2012: 6(338): 76–82 (in Russ.).
9. Toennies F. Obshchnost' i obshchestvo. Osnovnye ponyatiya chistoj sociologii [Community and Society. Basic Concepts of Pure Sociology]. Transl. from Germ. by D. V. Sklyadneva. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, 2002: 451 (in Russ.).
10. Titaev K., Shklyaruk M. Rossijskij sledovatel': prizvanie, professiya, povsednevnost' [Russian Criminal Investigators: a Calling, a Profession, and an Everydayness]. Moscow, Norma, 2016: 192 (in Russ.).
11. Aldous J., Durkheim E., Tonnies F. An exchange between Durkheim and Tonnies on the nature of social relations, with an introduction by Joan Aldous. American Journal of Sociology, 1972: 77(6): 1191–1200.
12. Bagiyan A. Y. et al. Forming professional identity in popular science IT discourse: discursive markers and their functional diapason. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 2019: 7 (6): 263–270. DOI: 10.18510/hssr.2019.7647
13. Bauman Z. Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons, 2013: 240.
14. Becker H. S. (ed.). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002: 456.
15. Bocqueraz C. The development of professional associations: the experience of French accountants from the 1880s to the 1940s. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 2001: 11(1): 7–27. DOI: 10.1080/09585200010015004
16. Buysse V., Sparkman K. L., Wesley P. W. Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional children. 2003: 69(3): 263–277.
17. Carvalho T., Videira P. Losing autonomy? Restructuring higher education institutions governance and relations between teaching and non-teaching staff. Studies in Higher Education, 2019: 44 (4): 762–773. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1401059
18. Castells M. A network theory of power. International journal of communication, 2011: 5: 773–787.
19. Duguid P. “The art of knowing”: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. Brill Sense, 2012: 147–162.
20. Freidson E. Theory of professionalism: Method and substance. International review of sociology, 1999: 9(1): 117–129.
21. Gibson D. M., Dollarhide C. T., Moss J. M. Professional identity development: A grounded theory of transformational tasks of new counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 2010: 50 (1): 21–38. DOI: 10.1002/J.1556-6978.2010.TB00106.X
22. Gispen K. New profession, old order: Engineers and German society, 1815-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 368.
23. Glaze-Crampes A. L. Leveraging communities of practice as professional learning communities in science, technology, engineering, math (STEM) education. Education Sciences, 2020: 10 (8): 190. DOI: 10.3390/educsci10080190
24. Goode W. J. Community within a community: The professions. American sociological review, 1957: 22 (2): 194–200.
25. Martimianakis M. A., Maniate J. M., Hodges B. D. Sociological interpretations of professionalism. Medical education, 2009: 43 (9): 829–837. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03408.x
26. Merton R. K. The functions of the professional association. The American journal of nursing, 1958: 50–54.
27. Parker D. B., Barrett R. J. Symbolism of community II: The boundary between community mental health professional and community. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2006: 40 (4): 318–324. DOI: 1440-1614.2006.01797.x
28. Perrucci R., Gerstl J. E. Profession without community: Engineers in American society New York, Random House, 1969: 194.
29. Pratt M. G., Rockmann K. W., Kaufmann J. B. Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of management journal, 2006: 49 (2): 235–262. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786060
30. Salvatore D., Numerato D., Fattore G. Physicians’ professional autonomy and their organizational identification with their hospital. BMC Health Services Research, 2018: 18 (1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3582-z
31. Shipunova O. D., Berezovskaya I. P. Organization technology of professional interactions in the engineering environments. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 2019: 9 (10): 2020–2028.
32. Tsui A. S. Editor's introduction – Autonomy of inquiry: Shaping the future of emerging scientific communities. Management and Organization Review, 2009. 5 (1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00143.x