Foreign-culture immigrants in Denmark's political agenda

This article examines the political discourse on foreign-culture immigrants, that forms the agenda of the Danish government. The difficulties of integrating migrants increase with the influx of asylum seekers and family reunification, when the rate of their admission exceeds the rate of naturalisation (absorption) of diasporas, that Danes see as a threat to social cohesion. A “preventive” immigration policy has emerged, demonstrating significant restrictions that reduce the influx of refugees. The discourse of restrictive policy supported by the electorate determined the government's agenda based on agreements between the center-left Social Democratic Party, the center-right Liberal Party of Wenströ, and the far-right Danish National Party (DNP) with its anti-immigrant agenda. At the same time, the ruling parties, weakening the support of the extreme right-wing parties, "intercept" the provisions of the DNP programme.

Restrictions on the political agenda concern mainly foreign-culture immigrants: strict regulation of the admission of asylum seekers, granting a residence permit, family reunification, initial distribution to municipalities and resettlement of immigrant "ghettos". This is combined with the education of immigrants based on the values ​​of social cohesion, work for the welfare state, and the inclusion of immigrant children in educational institutions. The discourse also includes the issues of deportation of immigrants, including asylum seekers, who commit crimes, the detention of asylum seekers not in Denmark and the EU countries, but in third countries that the government intends to make special agreements with. Taking into account the difficulties of returning refugees to the countries of origin, even if life there has become safer, this option is considered the most optimum, and appropriate work is being carried out in this direction.

The EU leadership condemns such a policy, but in the conditions of the weakness of its immigration policy, legal collisions, as well as the weakening of the solidarity of the Union members, there is no political opportunity from the outside to forcibly adjust the Danish state policy. In other EU countries, Denmark's preventive restrictive policy can be perceived as a positive model for the reception and integration of refugees of other cultures. The Danish experience is also useful for Russia, where problems arise in working with foreign-culture diasporas. In addition, such restrictive policies are helping to strengthen mobilisation mechanisms to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

foreign-culture immigrants, political agenda, political discourse, preventive restrictive policy, social integration, political parties, values of the welfare state, social cohesion

1. Babynina L. Zabytyj referendum [The forgotten Referendum]. Analiticheskie zapiski Instituta Evropy` RAN, 2016: 21 (51): 1–4. Accessed 19.05.2021. URL: https://www.instituteofeurope.ru/images/uploads/analitika/an51.pdf (in Russ.).

2. Voynikov V. V. From the mediterranean to the baltic: the problem of implementing the principle of solidarity in the eu area of immigration and asylum. Baltic Region, 2019: 11: 2: 17–31 (in Russ.).

3. Volkov A. M. Migration flows to Nordic Countries. Vestnik Diplomaticheskoj akademii MID Rossii, 2020: 1 (23): 126–142 (in Russ.).

4. Denisenko M. B., Xaraeva O. A., Chudinovskix O. S. Immigracionnaya politika v Rossijskoj Federacii i stranax Zapada [Immigration policy in the Russian Federation and Western countries]. Nauchnye trudy Fonda «Institut e`konomicheskoj politiki im. E. T. Gajdara». Moscow, 2003: 61: 314 (in Russ.).

5. Matyuxova E. I. Migration challenges in the eu amid the COVID-19 pandemic: fostering solidarity or threatening the cohesion? Analiz i prognozirovanie. Zhurnal IMEMO, 2020: 4: 94–107 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2020-4-94-107

6. Plevako N. S. Parliamentary elections in Denmark. Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN, 2019: 3 (9): 42–48 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320194247

7. Potemkina O. Yu. Evropejskij soyuz v poiskakh ideal`noj sistemy upravleniya [The European Union in search of an ideal management system]. Analiticheskie zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN, 2020: 3 (186): 1–8 (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics32020

8. Potemkina O. Yu. The reform of the eu's justices and homes affairs and the treaty of Lisbon: towards the deeper political integration. Aktual`nye problemy Evropy, 2010: 2: 102–127 (in Russ.).

9. Semenenko I. S. Integraciya inokul`turnykh soobshhestv v razvitykh stranakh [Integration of foreign cultural communities in developed countries]. In: Upravlenie gosudarstvom: Problemy i tendencii razvitiya. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik 2007. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2008: 448–501 (in Russ.).

10. Solovyov A. I. Political agenda of the government, or why the state needs the society. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2019: 4: 8–25 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.04.02

11. Talalaeva E. Yu., Pronina T. S. Ethno-confessional immigrant ghettos as a national security problem in denmark's social and political discourse. Baltic Region, 2020: 12: 3: 55–71 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2020-3-4

12. Czapenko I. Promising practices of migrant integration. Mirovaya politika i mezhdunarodny`e otnosheniya, 2019: 63: 10: 97–108 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-10-97-108

13. Shadrina O. N., Matveeva E. A. Current state of migration policy of the kingdom of denmark in reflection of statistics (2015-2020). Gumanitarnyj nauchnyj vestnik, 2020: 7: 1–10 (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3979356

14. Andersen Torben M. Migration, Redistribution and the Universal Welfare Model. IZA Discussion Paper, 2012 (June): 6665: 3–27. Accessed 17.04.2021. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2089714

15. Berry J. W. Contexts of Acculturation. In: Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition. Ed. by Berry J. W., Phinney L. S., Sam D. L., Vedder P. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006: 27–42.

16. Borevi K., Bengtsson B. The tension between choice and need in the housing of newcomers: A theoretical framework and an application on Scandinavian settlement policies. Urban Studies, 2015: 52 (14): 2599–2615. DOI:10.1177/0042098014548137

17. Breunig Ch., Cao X., Luedtke A. Global Migration and Political Regime Type: A Democratic Disadvantage. British Journal of Political Science, 2012 (October): 42: 4: 825–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000051

18. Brochmann G., Hagelund A. Migrants in the scandinavian welfare state. The emergence of a social policy problem. Nordic Journal of Migration Research (NJMR), 2011: 1 (1): 13–24. DOI: 10.2478/v10202-011-0003-3

19. Collier P., Hoeffner A. Migration, Diasporas and Culture: An Empirical Investigation. Kyklos, 2018: 71: 1: 86–109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12163

20. Dénes A. Immigrant gangs plague Denmark and the only solution is deportation: former immigration minister. Remix News, August 31, 2020. Accessed 22.05.2021. URL: https://rmx.news/commentary/immigrant-gangs-plague-denmark-and-the-only-solutin-is-deportation-former-immigration-minister/

21. Denmark wants to break up ethnic enclaves. What is wrong with them? The Economist, November 28, 2019. Accessed 21.05.2021. URL: https://www.economist.com/international/2019/11/28/denmark-wants-to-break-up-ethnic-enclaves-what-is-wrong-with-them

22. Hagelund A. After the refugee crisis: public discourse and policy change in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Comparative Migration Studies, 2020: 8 (13). DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0169-8

23. Hedetoft U. Denmark: Integrating Immigrants into a Homogeneous Welfare State. Migration Policy Institute, November 1, 2006. Accessed 24.06.2021. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/denmark-integrating-immigrants-homogeneous-welfare-state

24. Hovden J., Mjelde H., Gripsrud J. The Syrian refugee crisis in Scandinavian newspapers. Communications, 2018: 43 (3): 325–356. DOI: 10.1515/commun-2018-0013

25. Howarth D. The Compromise on Denmark and the Treaty on European Union: A Legal and Political Analysis. Common Market Law Review, 1994: 34 (1): 765–805.

26. Jørgensen M. B. Decentralising immigrant integration: Denmark’s mainstreaming initiatives in employment, education, and social affairs. Brussels, Migration Policy Institute Europe, 2014: 32.

27. Kampmark B. The Danish Elections: Social Democracy with an Inhumane Face. CounterPunch, June 12, 2019. Accessed 21.05.2021. URL: https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/06/12/the-danish-elections-social-democracy-with-an-inhumane-face/

28. Kongshøj К. Acculturation and expectations? Investigating Differences in Generalised Trust between Non-Western Immigrants and Ethnic Danes. Nordic Journal of Migration Research (NJMR), 2018: 8 (1): 35–46. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2018-0006

29. Lægaard S. Danish Anti-Multiculturalism? The Significance of the Political Framing of Diversity. Ed. by Kivisto P., Wahlbeck Ö. Debating Multiculturalism in the Nordic Welfare States. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013: 170–196.

30. Negri F. Partisan influence on social and labour market policies in the Silver Age of welfare state retrenchment: evidences from 19 OECD countries. Acta Polit, 2021: 56: 89–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00147-7

31. Panizza F., Miorelli R. Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory. Political Studies, 2012: 61: 2: 310–312. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00967.x

32. Peers S. EU Reform Treaty: Analysis 1: Version 3: JHA provisions. Statewatch analysis, October 22, 2007: 22. Accessed 25.06.2021. URL: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2007/oct/eu-refrom-treaty-jha-anal-1-ver-3.pdf

33. Schmidt V. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 2008: 11: 303–326. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342

34. Trauner F. Asylum policy: the EU’s ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure. Journal of European Integration, 2016: 38: 3: 311–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1140756

35. Gruppe af asylansøgere går til Sverige via Øresundsbro. Politiken, Maj 27, 2016. Accessed 12.06.2021. URL: https://politiken.dk/udland/fokus_int/Flygtningestroem/art5623520/Gruppe-af-asylansøgere-går-til-Sverige-via-Øresundsbro

36. Jørgensen P. Udlændingeloven. Politiken, Marts 12, 2015. Accessed 12.06.2021. URL: https://politiken.dk/indland/100procent/art5569493/Udlændingeloven

37. Kosovic B. Vi lever ienfrivillig apartheid. Politiken, Maj 9, 2021. Accessed 18.05.2021. URL: https://politiken.dk/debat/debatindlaeg/art8194580/Vi-lever-i-en-frivillig-apartheid

38. Lisborg M. Jeg har arbejdet med flygtninge i Danmark og udlandet, og en ting er sikker: EU's politik er en katastrofe. Politiken. Marts 30, 2017. Accessed 12.06.2021. URL: https://politiken.dk/debat/kroniken/art5893650/Jeg-har-arbejdet-med-flygtninge-i-Danmark-og-udlandet-og-en-ting-er-sikker-EUs-politik-er-en-katastrofe

39. Lombard-Latune M.-A. Asile: «Il fauttourner le dos au système de Dublin, un échec patent». L`Opinion, Septembre 25, 2019. Accessed 12.06.2021. URL: https://www.lopinion.fr/edition/politique/asile-il-faut-tourner-dos-systeme-dublin-echec-patent-198680