Sociological approach to the analysis of structured extracurricular activities and school performance among children with disabilities

 The article discusses the correlation between structured extracurricular activities and the performance of children with disabilities. This interrelation is theoretically substantiated and studied in various social sciences, including sociology. The positive relationship of these variables can be explained through the prism of sociological theories, thanks to the scientific work of sociologists Coleman, Bourdieu and Portes. The author provides an overview of the theoretical rationale for the positive impact of extracurricular activities on student performance at school: “development models”, Coleman’s hypothesis “on leadership in the crowd”, the concept of “social capital”. The correlation between structured extracurricular activities and academic achievement is also supported by empirical research around the world. However, at the moment, insufficient attention has been paid to studying this issue on groups of children with disabilities, for whom additional classes are an important resource for adaptation to social life, including after receiving secondary education. The discussion about the interconnection of these parameters is rarely traced in the field of the social sciences either. The sample of the field study carried out by the author included students from correctional programmes at a boarding school in a Russian city with a population of one million. Using the method of linear regression analysis, models were built in which the students average score in school subjects was predicted based on data on the duration of their studies in additional programmes in art and sports. The results of the analysis showed that the duration of classes in art sections is positively associated with the school performance of children with mental disorders both in primary and secondary school, that indicates the importance of such classes for achieving success in learning and, as a result, for successful adaptation to life after school. Activities in sports clubs do not significantly affect the school performance of children from this sample, but neither they have a negative impact. The conclusions obtained by the author are of practical importance for the heads of Russian correctional schools, who make decisions on the need to develop additional education for students on the basis of their educational institutions and for the state authorities supervising these institutions.

structured extracurricular activities, academic achievements, after-school trainings, children with disabilities, special education, boarding school

1. Malofeev N. N. Osobiy rebenok – vchera, segodnja, zavtra (Obrazovanie i psihologopedagogicheskaja pomosch’ detiam s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostiami zdorov’ja v XXI veke) [Special Child – Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (Education and Psycho-pedagogical Assistance to Children with Disabilities in the XXI Century)]. Moscow: GNU «Institut korrekcionnoy pedagogiki», 2007. 145 p. (In Russ.)
2. Abizada A., Gurbanova I., Iskandarova A., Nadirzada N. The Effect of Extracurricular Activities on Academic Performance in Secondary School: The Case of Azerbaijan. International Review of Education. 2020. Vol. 66. No. 4. P. 487–507. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-020-09833-2
3. Bailey R. Sport, Physical Activity and Educational Achievement – Towards an Explanatory Model. Sport in Society. 2017. Vol. 20. No. 7. P. 768–788. DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2016.1207756
4. Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press. 1985. P. 241–58
5. Bradley J. L., Conway P. F. A Dual Step Transfer Model: Sport and Non-sport Extracurricular Activities and the Enhancement of Academic Achievement. British Educational Research Journal. 2016. Vol. 42. No. 4. P. 703–728. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3232
6. Broh B. A. Linking Extracurricular Programming to Academic Achievement: Who Benefits and Why? Sociology of Education. 2002. Vol. 75. No. 1. P. 69–95. DOI: 10.2307/3090254
7. Byun S., Pong S. Children’s Highbrow Cultural Activities and Academic Achievement in Hong Kong. Research in the Sociology of Education. 2016. Vol. 19. P. 123–148. DOI: 10.1108/ S1479-353920150000019006
8. Champely S. Package ‘pwr’. March 17, 2020. Basic Functions for Power Analysis. Accessed 15.11.2020. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdf
9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, N.J, Routledge. 1988. 400 p.
10. Coleman J. S. The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education. New York, Free Press of Glencoe. 1961. 368 p.
11. Coleman J. S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology. 1988. Vol. 94. P. 95–120. DOI: 10.1086/228943
12. Covay E., Carbonaro W. After the Bell: Participation in Extracurricular Activities, Classroom Behavior, and Academic Achievement. Sociology of Education. 2010. Vol. 83. No. 1. P. 20–45. DOI: 10.1177/0038040709356565
13. Darling N., Caldwell L. L., Smith R. Participation in School-based Extracurricular Activities and Adolescent Adjustment. Journal of Leisure Research. 2005. Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 51–76.
14. Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons Proclaimed by General Assembly Resolution 3447 (XXX). 1975. Accessed 15.11.2020. URL: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightsOfDisabledPersons.aspx
15. Denault A. S., Poulin F. Predictors of Adolescent Participation in Organized Activities: A Five‐Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2009. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 287–311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00597.x
16. Dumais S. A. Cohort and Gender Differences in Extracurricular Participation: The Relationship Between Activities, Math Achievement, and College Expectations. Sociological Spectrum. 2008. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 72–100.
17. Dumais S. A. Elementary School Students’ Extracurricular Activities: The Effects of Participation on Achievement and Teachers’ Evaluations. Sociological Spectrum. 2006. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 117–147. DOI: 10.1080/02732170500444593
18. Eccles J. S. et al. Extracurricular Activities and Adolescent Development. Journal of Social Issues. 2003. Vol. 59. No. 4. P. 865–889.
19. Feldman A. F., Matjasko J. The Role of School-Based Extracurricular Activities in Adolescent Development: A Comprehensive Review and Future Directions. Review of Educational Research. 2005. Vol. 75. P. 159–210. DOI: 10.3102/00346543075002159
20. Forneris T., Camiré M., Williamson R. Extracurricular Activity Participation and the Acquisition of Developmental Assets: Differences Between Involved and Noninvolved Canadian High School Students. Applied Developmental Science. 2015. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 47–55. DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2014.980580
21. Fulmer A. Investigating Relationships Between Academic Achievement and After School Programs in a High School Environment (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina. 2013. 92 p.
22. Gilman R., Meyers J., Perez L. Structured Extracurricular Activities among Adolescents: Findings and Implications for School Psychologists. Psychology in the Schools. 2004. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 31–41. DOI: 10.1002/pits.10136
23. Hanson S. L., Kraus R. S. Women, Sports, and Science: Do Female Athletes Have an Advantage? Sociology of Education. 1998. Vol. 71. No. 2. P. 93–110. DOI: 10.2307/2673243
24. Jordan W. J., Nettles S. M. How Students Invest their Time outside of School: Effects on School-related Outcomes. Social Psychology of Education. 1999. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 217–243. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009655611694
25. Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. 298 p.
26. Mahoney J. L., Larson R. W., Eccles J. S. Organized Activities as Contexts of Development: Extracurricular Activities, After School and Community Programs. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2005. 565 p.
27. McHale S. M., Crouter A. C., Tucker Corinna J. Free‐Time Activities in Middle Childhood: Links with Adjustment in Early Adolescence. Child Development. 2003. Vol. 72. No. 6. P. 1764–1778. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00377
28. McNeal R. B. Extracurricular Activities and High School Dropouts. Sociology of Education. 1995. Vol. 68. No. 1. P. 62–80. DOI: 10.2307/2112764
29. Moriana J. A. et al. Extra-curricular Activities and Academic Performance in Secondary Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 2006. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 35–46.
30. Portes A. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 1–24.
31. Rehberg R. A. Behavioral and Attitudinal Consequences of High School Interscholastic Sports: A Speculative Consideration. Adolescence. 1969. Vol. 4. No. 13. P. 69–88.
32. Shulruf B., Tumen S., Tolley H. Extracurricular Activities in School, Do They Matter? Children and Youth Services Review. 2008. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 418–426. DOI: 10.1016/j. childyouth.2007.10.012