The socio-cultural conditions for the adaptation of “new” ethnic groups in the Republic of Tatarstan

Censuses conducted at the turn of the 21^st century reveal an increase in ethnic diversity in Tatarstan. The migration of people, who became the namesakes for Soviet republics and CIS states, has lead to the emergence of unconventional ethnic groups in this region. Matters regarding why some of their members are able to establish themselves in the region, while others are not, as well as the factors which affect the process – all of this has not been sufficiently examined. The key objective of this study was to reveal the subjective socio-cultural conditions for the process of “new” ethnic groups attaching themselves to Tatarstan, them having spent various amounts of time in the republic. In 2016 the authors conducted a study of the aforementioned process while focusing on the Tajiks and Uzbeks living in Tatarstan. Using a qualitative approach (while utilizing interview method), which involved exposing the most typical forms of the subjective perception of migration (phenomenology of M. Weber, A. Schutz, E. Husserl, H. Bergson). In depth interviews revealed that the length of stay and an absence of plans for leaving the region of settlement are insufficient (in some cases even invalid) markers of migrant adaptation: the latter should be determined using the socio-cultural characteristics of inbound migrants. These would include their socialization in their regions of departure, their migration experience and reasons for moving to Tatarstan, whether they have a family or not, their family ties, whether they regard themselves and their children as citizens of the Russian Federation, the degree to which they have absorbed the cultural norms of the host community (which includes knowledge of the local languages), their ethnic identity and interethnic networks. Analyzing these parameters allowed for highlighting three adaptation strategies utilized by Tajiks and Uzbeks living in the Republic of Tatarstan. The first one is represented by those who moved there at the end of the Soviet period, or the beginning of the post-Soviet period. These are the “old inhabitants”. This group does not include those who have not integrated, despite them staying in Tatarstan for prolonged periods several times. They do not possess their own residence, or Russian citizenship, and do not seek to attain it. They have no intent to adopt the culture of the host society, often live in isolation, while their families reside in Tajikistan or Uzbekistan. An intermediate position is occupied by migrants who have been living in Tatarstan for quite a long time. All of them are employed, some of them have their own residence and Russian citizenship. Some of them live there together with their families. Such informants consider themselves distant from the locals in terms of culture, while considering their regions of departure to be their homeland. Despite the varying degree of attachment (or lack thereof), one common thing among all of those migrants surveyed is the fact that Islam was one of the key motivational terms of their migration.

migrants, Tatarstan, Tajiks, Uzbeks, survival, socio-cultural features.

Bilalova N. Model' «Novogo veka» [Model of «New century»]. Nash dom Tatarstan, 2018, no 5 (56).

Varshavskaia E. Y., Denisenko M. B. Mobil'nost' inostrannykh rabotnikov na rynke truda [Foreign workers mobility in Russian labor market]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2014, no 4, pp. 63–73.

Deti Peterburga. Pomosch' detiam migrantov. Kul'turno- prosvetitel'skie programmy dlia detey-podrostkov [Children of St. Petersburg. Assistance to migrant children. Cultural and educational programmers for children and adolescents].) “Petersburg Children” website. URL: http:// detipeterburga.ru [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Gabdrafikov I. M., Husnutdinova L. G. Integracija migrantov v respublikah Povolzh'ia kak problema obschestvennogo vosprijatija i obschestvenno-gosudarstvennogo partniorstva [Integration of migrants in the Volga republics as a problem of public perception and public-state partnership]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul'turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2015, no 12 (62), part IV, pp. 47–50.

Demograficheskiy ponyatijniy slovar` [Demographic conceptual dictionary]. Ed. by L. L. Rybakovskiy. Moscow, CSP, 2003.

Zajonchkovskaya Zh. A. Novosely v gorodah (metody izucheniya prizhivaemosti) [New settlers in cities (methods of survival studying)]. Moscow, Statistika, 1972. 164 p.

Identifikacionnye strategii diaspornykh i zemljacheskikh grupp v rossiyskikh regionah [The identification strategy of Diaspora and compatriot groups in the Russian regions]. Ed. by A. V. Dmitriev. Moscow, Novy khronograf, 2016. 208 p.

Ioncev V., Ivahniuk I. Modeli integracii migrantov v sovremennoy Rossii [Models of integration of migrants in modern Russia], CARIM-East RR 2013/12, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), European University Institute, 2013.

Itogi Vsesoyuznoy perepisi naseleniya 1989 goda [Results of the all-Union population census of the year 1989]. Kazan', 1990.

Kozlov V. E., Frolova E. V., Viatchina M. V. Diaspory i soobschestva migrantov v Respublike Tatarstan: etnosociologicheskie ocherki [Diaspora and migrant communities in the Republic of Tatarstan: ethno-sociological essays]. Part III. Kazan, Glagol, 2016. 255 p.

Kon'kov A. T. Problema integracii etnicheskih migrantov na Dal'nem Vostoke Rossii i eyo osobennosti v Sahalinskoy oblasti [The problem of integration of ethnic migrants in the far East and its features in the Sakhalin region]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Series 18: Sociology and political science, 2015, no 1, pp. 206–220. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2015-0-1-206-220

Martynova M. Y. Etnokul'turnye aspekty adaptacii migrantov [Ethno-cultural aspects of migrant adaptation]. Positive experience in regulating ethno-social and ethno-cultural processes in the regions of the Russian Federation. Kazan, Sh. Marjani Institute of History of TAS publ., 2016, pp. 28–32.

Mezhetnicheskaia napriazhionnost' v menjajuschemsia social'nom contexte: rezul'taty issledovaniia [Interethnic tensions in a changing social context: the results of the study]. Moscow, FCTAS RAS publ., 2017. 133 p. URL: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/INAB/INAB_1_2017.pdf [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Migranty na rossiyskom rynke truda: za i protiv [Migrants on the Russian labor market: pros and cons]. RCPOR Press release, no 3072 (30.03.2016). The Official website. URL https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115643 [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Migranty, migrantofobii i imigracionnaia politika [Migrants, migrant-phobia and immigration policy]. Ed. by V. I. Mukomel'. Moscow, Central house of the lawyer, Bureau for human rights, “Academia” publ., 2014. 245 p.

Mokin K. S. Adaptaciya migrantov: varianty` strategiy [Migrant adaptation: strategy options] Novye etnicheskie gruppy v Rossii. Puti grazhdanskoy integracii. Rossiyskiy fond fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. 2009. RFBR Official web portal. URL: http://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/books/o_25857#1 [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Mukomel' V. I. Politika integracii migrantov v Rossii: vyzovy, potencialnye riski: rabochaia tetrad' [Migrant integration policy in Russia: challenges, potential risks: workbook]. Moscow, Speckniga, 2013. 34 p.

Muhametshina N. S. Problemy integracii migrantov v regional'ny socium [Problems of integration of migrants into regional societies]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2013, vol. 15.1, pp. 138–142.

Nam I. V. "Novye" etnicheskie gruppy (diaspory) v gorode Tomske [“New ethnic groups (Diaspora) in Tomsk]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriia, 2015, no 5 (37), pp. 34–43. DOI 10.17223/19988613/37/5

Reytblat A. I. Diaspory i "Diaspory" (Obzor zhurnala "Diaspory") [Diaspora and “Diaspora” (Overview of Diaspora magazine). New Literature Review website. URL: http://nlobooks.ru/node/5151 [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Rybakovskiy L. L. Migraciia naseleniia (voprosy teorii). Stadii migracionnogo processa. [Population migration (the theory). Stages of the migration process]. London. Rybakovsky personal website. URL: http://rybakovsky.ru/migracia2n.html [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Sagdieva E., Gabdrakhmanova G., Musina R. Osvoenie prostranstva. Social'no-economicheskie praktiki trudovykh migrantov v Rossii [The development of space. Socio-economic practices of migrant workers in Russia]. Saarbrucken, LAP publ., 2011. 153 p.

Semionova V. V. Kachestvennye metody: vvedenie v gumanisticheskuju sotsiologiju [Qualitative methods: introduction to humanistic sociology]. Moscow, Dobrosvet, 1998. 290 p.

Shurupova A. S. Adaptacija i prizhivaemost' migrantov [Adaptation and survival of migrants]. The E.S.M. Web portal. URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/148/801/1219/012_Shurupova.pdf [date of visit: 18.04.2018].

Yuzhanin M. A. O sociokul'turnoy adaptacii v inoetnicheskoy srede: konceptual'nye podhody k analizu [On sociocultural adaptation in the non-ethnic environment: conceptual approaches to the analysis]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2007, no 5, pp. 70–77.